Expert with Clustering: Hierarchical Online Preference Learning Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Emerging mobility systems are increasingly capable of recommending options to mobility users, to guide them towards personalized yet sustainable system outcomes. Even more so than the typical recommendation system, it is crucial to minimize regret, because 1) the mobility options directly affect the lives of the users, and 2) the system sustainability relies on sufficient user participation. In this study, we consider accelerating user preference learning by exploiting a low-dimensional latent space that captures the mobility preferences of users. We introduce a hierarchical contextual bandit framework named Expert with Clustering (EWC), which integrates clustering techniques and prediction with expert advice. EWC efficiently utilizes hierarchical user information and incorporates a novel Loss-guided Distance metric. This metric is instrumental in generating more representative cluster centroids. In a recommendation scenario with N users, T rounds per user, and K options, our algorithm achieves a regret bound of O(N√Tlog K + NT). This bound consists of two parts: the first term is the regret from the Hedge algorithm, and the second term depends on the average loss from clustering. To the best of the authors knowledge, this is the first work to analyze the regret of an integrated expert algorithm with k-Means clustering. This regret bound underscores the theoretical and experimental efficacy of EWC, particularly in scenarios that demand rapid learning and adaptation. Experimental results highlight that EWC can substantially reduce regret by 27.57% compared to the LinUCB baseline. Our work offers a data-efficient approach to capturing both individual and collective behaviors, making it highly applicable to contexts with hierarchical structures. We expect the algorithm to be applicable to other settings with layered nuances of user preferences and information.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2024.
Builds on
9 of 18 references.
References · 9
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 503
- 2014Online Clustering of Banditscited by 102
- 2016On Context-Dependent Clustering of Banditscited by 44
- 2023Learning Personalized Models with Clustered System Identificationcited by 11
- 2022Online Learning for Traffic Routing under Unknown Preferencescited by 4
- 2017Uniform Deviation Bounds for Unbounded Loss Functions like k-Meanscited by 2
- 2022Evaluation of the Driving Performance and User Acceptance of a Predictive Eco-Driving Assistance System for Electric Vehiclescited by 2
- 2022Effective and Acceptable Eco-Driving Guidance for Human-Driving Vehicles: A Reviewcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Route Recommendations for Traffic Management Under Learned Partial Driver Compliancecited by 2
- 2026Human-in-the-Loop Contextual Bandits for Short-Term Rental Dynamic Pricing: Structural Equivalence of Historical Warm-Up and Approval-Gated Live Learningcited by 2
- 2024The Nah Bandit: Modeling User Non-compliance in Recommendation Systemscited by 0
- 2026Human-in-the-Loop Contextual Bandits for Short-Term Rental Dynamic Pricing: Structural Equivalence of Historical Warm-Up and Approval-Gated Live Learning22 May 2026
- 2025Route Recommendations for Traffic Management Under Learned Partial Driver Compliance3 Apr 2025
- 2024The Nah Bandit: Modeling User Non-compliance in Recommendation Systems15 Aug 2024