mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Validating Climate Models with Spherical Convolutional Wasserstein Distance

arXiv 2401.14657 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2024stat.AP cs.LG physics.ao-phcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The validation of global climate models is crucial to ensure the accuracy and efficacy of model output. We introduce the spherical convolutional Wasserstein distance to more comprehensively measure differences between climate models and reanalysis data. This new similarity measure accounts for spatial variability using convolutional projections and quantifies local differences in the distribution of climate variables. We apply this method to evaluate the historical model outputs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) members by comparing them to observational and reanalysis data products. Additionally, we investigate the progression from CMIP phase 5 to phase 6 and find modest improvements in the phase 6 models regarding their ability to produce realistic climatologies.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2024.

Builds on

8 of 71 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Generalized Sliced Wasserstein Distancescited by 205
  2. 2019Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distance and its use for GANscited by 118
  3. 2023Energy-Based Sliced Wasserstein Distancecited by 39
  4. 2022Spherical Sliced-Wassersteincited by 31
  5. 2022Revisiting Sliced Wasserstein on Images: From Vectorization to Convolutioncited by 25
  6. 2019Evaluating proxy influence in assimilated paleoclimate reconstructions -- Testing the exchangeability of two ensembles of spatial processescited by 3
  7. 2020Regularized Variational Data Assimilation for Bias Treatment using the Wasserstein Metriccited by 2
  8. 2018Permutation Tests for Equality of Distributions of Functional Datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

9 papers.