MultiTest: Physical-Aware Object Insertion for Testing Multi-sensor Fusion Perception Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-sensor fusion stands as a pivotal technique in addressing numerous safety-critical tasks and applications, e.g., self-driving cars and automated robotic arms. With the continuous advancement in data-driven artificial intelligence (AI), MSF's potential for sensing and understanding intricate external environments has been further amplified, bringing a profound impact on intelligent systems and specifically on their perception systems. Similar to traditional software, adequate testing is also required for AI-enabled MSF systems. Yet, existing testing methods primarily concentrate on single-sensor perception systems (e.g., image-/point cloud-based object detection systems). There remains a lack of emphasis on generating multi-modal test cases for MSF systems. To address these limitations, we design and implement MultiTest, a fitness-guided metamorphic testing method for complex MSF perception systems. MultiTest employs a physical-aware approach to synthesize realistic multi-modal object instances and insert them into critical positions of background images and point clouds. A fitness metric is designed to guide and boost the test generation process. We conduct extensive experiments with five SOTA perception systems to evaluate MultiTest from the perspectives of: (1) generated test cases' realism, (2) fault detection capabilities, and (3) performance improvement. The results show that MultiTest can generate realistic and modality-consistent test data and effectively detect hundreds of diverse faults of an MSF system under test. Moreover, retraining an MSF system on the test cases generated by MultiTest can improve the system's robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
6 papers.
- 2024VLATest: Testing and Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulationcited by 45
- 2024Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 4
- 2025MObI: Multimodal Object Inpainting Using Diffusion Modelscited by 4
- 2025A Multi-Modality Evaluation of the Reality Gap in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 1
- 2025When Autonomous Vehicle Meets V2X Cooperative Perception: How Far Are We?cited by 0
- 2025A Digital Twin Framework for Metamorphic Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems Using Generative Modelcited by 0
- 2025A Digital Twin Framework for Metamorphic Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems Using Generative Model8 Oct 2025
- 2025When Autonomous Vehicle Meets V2X Cooperative Perception: How Far Are We?29 Sep 2025
- 2025A Multi-Modality Evaluation of the Reality Gap in Autonomous Driving Systems26 Sep 2025
- 2025MObI: Multimodal Object Inpainting Using Diffusion Models6 Jan 2025
- 2024VLATest: Testing and Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation19 Sep 2024
- 2024Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systems28 Feb 2024