AR-GAN: Generative Adversarial Network-Based Defense Method Against Adversarial Attacks on the Traffic Sign Classification System of Autonomous Vehicles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study developed a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based defense method for traffic sign classification in an autonomous vehicle (AV), referred to as the attack-resilient GAN (AR-GAN). The novelty of the AR-GAN lies in (i) assuming zero knowledge of adversarial attack models and samples and (ii) providing consistently high traffic sign classification performance under various adversarial attack types. The AR-GAN classification system consists of a generator that denoises an image by reconstruction, and a classifier that classifies the reconstructed image. The authors have tested the AR-GAN under no-attack and under various adversarial attacks, such as Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), DeepFool, Carlini and Wagner (C&W), and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD). The authors considered two forms of these attacks, i.e., (i) black-box attacks (assuming the attackers possess no prior knowledge of the classifier), and (ii) white-box attacks (assuming the attackers possess full knowledge of the classifier). The classification performance of the AR-GAN was compared with several benchmark adversarial defense methods. The results showed that both the AR-GAN and the benchmark defense methods are resilient against black-box attacks and could achieve similar classification performance to that of the unperturbed images. However, for all the white-box attacks considered in this study, the AR-GAN method outperformed the benchmark defense methods. In addition, the AR-GAN was able to maintain its high classification performance under varied white-box adversarial perturbation magnitudes, whereas the performance of the other defense methods dropped abruptly at increased perturbation magnitudes.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2023.
Builds on
17 of 41 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
- 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
- 2017Learning to Discover Cross-Domain Relations with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 278
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2018Feature Distillation: DNN-Oriented JPEG Compression Against Adversarial Examplescited by 99
5 more
- 2019The Limitations of Adversarial Training and the Blind-Spot Attackcited by 63
- 2017APE-GAN: Adversarial Perturbation Elimination with GANcited by 57
- 2019Universal Adversarial Perturbation for Text Classificationcited by 8
- 2021Hybrid Classical-Quantum Deep Learning Models for Autonomous Vehicle Traffic Image Classification Under Adversarial Attackcited by 6
- 2019Identifying Classes Susceptible to Adversarial Attackscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.