mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

At the junction between deep learning and statistics of extremes: formalizing the landslide hazard definition

arXiv 2401.14210 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2024cs.LG physics.geo-ph stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The most adopted definition of landslide hazard combines spatial information about landslide location (susceptibility), threat (intensity), and frequency (return period). Only the first two elements are usually considered and estimated when working over vast areas. Even then, separate models constitute the standard, with frequency being rarely investigated. Frequency and intensity are intertwined and depend on each other because larger events occur less frequently and vice versa. However, due to the lack of multi-temporal inventories and joint statistical models, modelling such properties via a unified hazard model has always been challenging and has yet to be attempted. Here, we develop a unified model to estimate landslide hazard at the slope unit level to address such gaps. We employed deep learning, combined with a model motivated by extreme-value theory to analyse an inventory of 30 years of observed rainfall-triggered landslides in Nepal and assess landslide hazard for multiple return periods. We also use our model to further explore landslide hazard for the same return periods under different climate change scenarios up to the end of the century. Our results show that the proposed model performs excellently and can be used to model landslide hazard in a unified manner. Geomorphologically, we find that under both climate change scenarios (SSP245 and SSP885), landslide hazard is likely to increase up to two times on average in the lower Himalayan regions while remaining the same in the middle Himalayan region whilst decreasing slightly in the upper Himalayan region areas.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 162 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.

Builds on

9 of 162 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,423
  4. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  5. 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
  6. 2020Estimating the Prediction Performance of Spatial Models via Spatial k-Fold Cross Validationcited by 14
  7. 2022Generalizability of Machine Learning Models: Quantitative Evaluation of Three Methodological Pitfallscited by 12
  8. 2023Deep graphical regression for jointly moderate and extreme Australian wildfirescited by 8
  9. 2022Joint modeling of landslide counts and sizes using spatial marked point processes with sub-asymptotic mark distributionscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.