mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Information That Matters: Exploring Information Needs of People Affected by Algorithmic Decisions

arXiv 2401.13324 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Every AI system that makes decisions about people has a group of stakeholders that are personally affected by these decisions. However, explanations of AI systems rarely address the information needs of this stakeholder group, who often are AI novices. This creates a gap between conveyed information and information that matters to those who are impacted by the system's decisions, such as domain experts and decision subjects. To address this, we present the "XAI Novice Question Bank," an extension of the XAI Question Bank containing a catalog of information needs from AI novices in two use cases: employment prediction and health monitoring. The catalog covers the categories of data, system context, system usage, and system specifications. We gathered information needs through task-based interviews where participants asked questions about two AI systems to decide on their adoption and received verbal explanations in response. Our analysis showed that participants' confidence increased after receiving explanations but that their understanding faced challenges. These included difficulties in locating information and in assessing their own understanding, as well as attempts to outsource understanding. Additionally, participants' prior perceptions of the systems' risks and benefits influenced their information needs. Participants who perceived high risks sought explanations about the intentions behind a system's deployment, while those who perceived low risks rather asked about the system's operation. Our work aims to support the inclusion of AI novices in explainability efforts by highlighting their information needs, aims, and challenges. We summarize our findings as five key implications that can inform the design of future explanations for lay stakeholder audiences.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 131 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2024.

Builds on

22 of 131 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  3. 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
  4. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  5. 2020Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systemscited by 139
  6. 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
  7. 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
  8. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  9. 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 67
  10. 2023Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision supportcited by 66
  11. 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63
  12. 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
10 more
  1. 2020The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 54
  2. 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AIcited by 49
  3. 2023Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAIcited by 33
  4. 2021Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 31
  5. 2023Dear XAI Community, We Need to Talk! Fundamental Misconceptions in Current XAI Researchcited by 22
  6. 2022"There Is Not Enough Information": On the Effects of Explanations on Perceptions of Informational Fairness and Trustworthiness in Automated Decision-Makingcited by 19
  7. 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
  8. 2023On the Impact of Explanations on Understanding of Algorithmic Decision-Makingcited by 9
  9. 2023Identifying Explanation Needs of End-users: Applying and Extending the XAI Question Bankcited by 8
  10. 2023Applying Interdisciplinary Frameworks to Understand Algorithmic Decision-Makingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.