Digital Divides in Scene Recognition: Uncovering Socioeconomic Biases in Deep Learning Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computer-based scene understanding has influenced fields ranging from urban planning to autonomous vehicle performance, yet little is known about how well these technologies work across social differences. We investigate the biases of deep convolutional neural networks (dCNNs) in scene classification, using nearly one million images from global and US sources, including user-submitted home photographs and Airbnb listings. We applied statistical models to quantify the impact of socioeconomic indicators such as family income, Human Development Index (HDI), and demographic factors from public data sources (CIA and US Census) on dCNN performance. Our analyses revealed significant socioeconomic bias, where pretrained dCNNs demonstrated lower classification accuracy, lower classification confidence, and a higher tendency to assign labels that could be offensive when applied to homes (e.g., "ruin", "slum"), especially in images from homes with lower socioeconomic status (SES). This trend is consistent across two datasets of international images and within the diverse economic and racial landscapes of the United States. This research contributes to understanding biases in computer vision, emphasizing the need for more inclusive and representative training datasets. By mitigating the bias in the computer vision pipelines, we can ensure fairer and more equitable outcomes for applied computer vision, including home valuation and smart home security systems. There is urgency in addressing these biases, which can significantly impact critical decisions in urban development and resource allocation. Our findings also motivate the development of AI systems that better understand and serve diverse communities, moving towards technology that equitably benefits all sectors of society.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.
Builds on
21 of 57 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
9 more
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
- 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 149
- 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2017Using Deep Learning and Google Street View to Estimate the Demographic Makeup of the UScited by 66
- 2022Gender and Racial Bias in Visual Question Answering Datasetscited by 39
- 2019Age and gender bias in pedestrian detection algorithmscited by 18
- 2018Take a Look Around: Using Street View and Satellite Images to Estimate House Pricescited by 16
- 2021The Limits of Global Inclusion in AI Developmentcited by 14
- 2021Beyond Algorithmic Bias: A Socio-Computational Interrogation of the Google Search by Image Algorithmcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.