Fast Adversarial Training against Textual Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many adversarial defense methods have been proposed to enhance the adversarial robustness of natural language processing models. However, most of them introduce additional pre-set linguistic knowledge and assume that the synonym candidates used by attackers are accessible, which is an ideal assumption. We delve into adversarial training in the embedding space and propose a Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) method to improve the model robustness in the synonym-unaware scenario from the perspective of single-step perturbation generation and perturbation initialization. Based on the observation that the adversarial perturbations crafted by single-step and multi-step gradient ascent are similar, FAT uses single-step gradient ascent to craft adversarial examples in the embedding space to expedite the training process. Based on the observation that the perturbations generated on the identical training sample in successive epochs are similar, FAT fully utilizes historical information when initializing the perturbation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FAT significantly boosts the robustness of BERT models in the synonym-unaware scenario, and outperforms the defense baselines under various attacks with character-level and word-level modifications.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
14 more
- 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
- 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 233
- 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 164
- 2020Adversarial Training for Large Neural Language Modelscited by 109
- 2016Crafting Adversarial Input Sequences for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 102
- 2020InfoBERT: Improving Robustness of Language Models from An Information Theoretic Perspectivecited by 92
- 2020SAFER: A Structure-free Approach for Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 72
- 2021Towards Robustness Against Natural Language Word Substitutionscited by 68
- 2021Searching for an Effective Defender: Benchmarking Defense against Adversarial Word Substitutioncited by 55
- 2020Frequency-Guided Word Substitutions for Detecting Textual Adversarial Examplescited by 54
- 2019Natural Language Adversarial Defense through Synonym Encodingcited by 39
- 2021Achieving Model Robustness through Discrete Adversarial Trainingcited by 23
- 2022Certified Robustness Against Natural Language Attacks by Causal Interventioncited by 23
- 2022Robust Textual Embedding against Word-level Adversarial Attackscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024OpenFact at CheckThat! 2024: Combining Multiple Attack Methods for Effective Adversarial Text Generationcited by 4
- 2024CFSafety: Comprehensive Fine-grained Safety Assessment for LLMscited by 1
- 2026Mitigating Error Amplification in Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 1
- 2024RCDM: Enabling Robustness for Conditional Diffusion Modelcited by 0
- 2024Advancing NLP Security by Leveraging LLMs as Adversarial Enginescited by 0
- 2024Defensive Dual Masking for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 0
- 2026Unveiling the Backdoor Mechanism Hidden Behind Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Unveiling the Backdoor Mechanism Hidden Behind Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training27 Apr 2026
- 2026Mitigating Error Amplification in Fast Adversarial Training27 Apr 2026
- 2024Defensive Dual Masking for Robust Adversarial Defense10 Dec 2024
- 2024CFSafety: Comprehensive Fine-grained Safety Assessment for LLMs29 Oct 2024
- 2024Advancing NLP Security by Leveraging LLMs as Adversarial Engines23 Oct 2024
- 2024OpenFact at CheckThat! 2024: Combining Multiple Attack Methods for Effective Adversarial Text Generation4 Sep 2024
- 2024RCDM: Enabling Robustness for Conditional Diffusion Model5 Aug 2024