The Dimension Strikes Back with Gradients: Generalization of Gradient Methods in Stochastic Convex Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the generalization performance of gradient methods in the fundamental stochastic convex optimization setting, focusing on its dimension dependence. First, for full-batch gradient descent (GD) we give a construction of a learning problem in dimension d=O(n2), where the canonical version of GD (tuned for optimal performance of the empirical risk) trained with n training examples converges, with constant probability, to an approximate empirical risk minimizer with Omega(1) population excess risk. Our bound translates to a lower bound of Omega (√d) on the number of training examples required for standard GD to reach a non-trivial test error, answering an open question raised by Feldman (2016) and Amir, Koren, and Livni (2021b) and showing that a non-trivial dimension dependence is unavoidable. Furthermore, for standard one-pass stochastic gradient descent (SGD), we show that an application of the same construction technique provides a similar Omega(√d) lower bound for the sample complexity of SGD to reach a non-trivial empirical error, despite achieving optimal test performance. This again provides an exponential improvement in the dimension dependence compared to previous work (Koren, Livni, Mansour, and Sherman, 2022), resolving an open question left therein.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.
Builds on
8 of 24 references.
References · 8
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
- 2016Generalization of ERM in Stochastic Convex Optimization: The Dimension Strikes Backcited by 37
- 2021SGD: The Role of Implicit Regularization, Batch-size and Multiple-epochscited by 22
- 2022Benign Underfitting of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 19
- 2021Never Go Full Batch (in Stochastic Convex Optimization)cited by 14
- 2023The Sample Complexity Of ERMs In Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 8
- 2023Initialization-Dependent Sample Complexity of Linear Predictors and Neural Networkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024The Sample Complexity of Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 6
- 2025Flat Minima and Generalization: Insights from Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 4
- 2025Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass Stochastic Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 3
- 2024Complexity of Vector-valued Prediction: From Linear Models to Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026All ERMs Can Fail in Stochastic Convex Optimization Lower Bounds in Linear Dimensioncited by 0
- 2026The Fourth Quadrant: A Stylized View of Benign Misfittingcited by 0
- 2026The Fourth Quadrant: A Stylized View of Benign Misfitting2 Aug 2026
- 2026All ERMs Can Fail in Stochastic Convex Optimization Lower Bounds in Linear Dimension9 Feb 2026
- 2025Flat Minima and Generalization: Insights from Stochastic Convex Optimization5 Nov 2025
- 2025Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass Stochastic Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization13 May 2025
- 2024Complexity of Vector-valued Prediction: From Linear Models to Stochastic Convex Optimization5 Dec 2024
- 2024The Sample Complexity of Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization7 Apr 2024