mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Review of Physics-Informed Machine Learning Methods with Applications to Condition Monitoring and Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2401.11860 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents a comprehensive overview of PIML techniques in the context of condition monitoring. The central concept driving PIML is the incorporation of known physical laws and constraints into machine learning algorithms, enabling them to learn from available data while remaining consistent with physical principles. Through fusing domain knowledge with data-driven learning, PIML methods offer enhanced accuracy and interpretability in comparison to purely data-driven approaches. In this comprehensive survey, detailed examinations are performed with regard to the methodology by which known physical principles are integrated within machine learning frameworks, as well as their suitability for specific tasks within condition monitoring. Incorporation of physical knowledge into the ML model may be realized in a variety of methods, with each having its unique advantages and drawbacks. The distinct advantages and limitations of each methodology for the integration of physics within data-driven models are detailed, considering factors such as computational efficiency, model interpretability, and generalizability to different systems in condition monitoring and fault detection. Several case studies and works of literature utilizing this emerging concept are presented to demonstrate the efficacy of PIML in condition monitoring applications. From the literature reviewed, the versatility and potential of PIML in condition monitoring may be demonstrated. Novel PIML methods offer an innovative solution for addressing the complexities of condition monitoring and associated challenges. This comprehensive survey helps form the foundation for future work in the field. As the technology continues to advance, PIML is expected to play a crucial role in enhancing maintenance strategies, system reliability, and overall operational efficiency in engineering systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 154 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.

Builds on

15 of 154 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  3. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  4. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  5. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  6. 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 65
  7. 2017DR-RNN: A deep residual recurrent neural network for model reductioncited by 20
  8. 2019Hybrid deep fault detection and isolation: Combining deep neural networks and system performance modelscited by 7
  9. 2019Fleet Prognosis with Physics-informed Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 6
  10. 2021Applying physics-based loss functions to neural networks for improved generalizability in mechanics problemscited by 5
  11. 2022PIDGeuN: Graph Neural Network-Enabled Transient Dynamics Prediction of Networked Microgrids Through Full-Field Measurementcited by 5
  12. 2020Physics-informed machine learning for sensor fault detection with flight test datacited by 4
3 more
  1. 2022Robust Regression with Highly Corrupted Data via Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 4
  2. 2021PPGN: Physics-Preserved Graph Networks for Real-Time Fault Location in Distribution Systems with Limited Observation and Labelscited by 3
  3. 2023Machine Fault Classification using Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.