A Deep Learning Approach for Selective Relevance Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) can enhance average retrieval effectiveness over a sufficiently large number of queries. However, PRF often introduces a drift into the original information need, thus hurting the retrieval effectiveness of several queries. While a selective application of PRF can potentially alleviate this issue, previous approaches have largely relied on unsupervised or feature-based learning to determine whether a query should be expanded. In contrast, we revisit the problem of selective PRF from a deep learning perspective, presenting a model that is entirely data-driven and trained in an end-to-end manner. The proposed model leverages a transformer-based bi-encoder architecture. Additionally, to further improve retrieval effectiveness with this selective PRF approach, we make use of the model's confidence estimates to combine the information from the original and expanded queries. In our experiments, we apply this selective feedback on a number of different combinations of ranking and feedback models, and show that our proposed approach consistently improves retrieval effectiveness for both sparse and dense ranking models, with the feedback models being either sparse, dense or generative.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Is Relevance Propagated from Retriever to Generator in RAG?cited by 11
- 2025Uncovering the Limitations of Query Performance Prediction: Failures, Insights, and Implications for Selective Query Processingcited by 2
- 2026Predicting Retrieval Utility and Answer Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 2
- 2026RAQG-QPP: Query Performance Prediction with Retrieved Query Variants and Retrieval Augmented Query Generationcited by 0
- 2026One Size Does Not Fit All! Dynamic Retriever and Generator Selection for RAGcited by 0
- 2026One Size Does Not Fit All! Dynamic Retriever and Generator Selection for RAG15 Sep 2026
- 2026RAQG-QPP: Query Performance Prediction with Retrieved Query Variants and Retrieval Augmented Query Generation29 Apr 2026
- 2026Predicting Retrieval Utility and Answer Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation20 Jan 2026
- 2025Uncovering the Limitations of Query Performance Prediction: Failures, Insights, and Implications for Selective Query Processing1 Apr 2025
- 2025Is Relevance Propagated from Retriever to Generator in RAG?20 Feb 2025