mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Image Safeguarding: Reasoning with Conditional Vision Language Model and Obfuscating Unsafe Content Counterfactually

arXiv 2401.11035 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Social media platforms are being increasingly used by malicious actors to share unsafe content, such as images depicting sexual activity, cyberbullying, and self-harm. Consequently, major platforms use artificial intelligence (AI) and human moderation to obfuscate such images to make them safer. Two critical needs for obfuscating unsafe images is that an accurate rationale for obfuscating image regions must be provided, and the sensitive regions should be obfuscated (textite.g. blurring) for users' safety. This process involves addressing two key problems: (1) the reason for obfuscating unsafe images demands the platform to provide an accurate rationale that must be grounded in unsafe image-specific attributes, and (2) the unsafe regions in the image must be minimally obfuscated while still depicting the safe regions. In this work, we address these key issues by first performing visual reasoning by designing a visual reasoning model (VLM) conditioned on pre-trained unsafe image classifiers to provide an accurate rationale grounded in unsafe image attributes, and then proposing a counterfactual explanation algorithm that minimally identifies and obfuscates unsafe regions for safe viewing, by first utilizing an unsafe image classifier attribution matrix to guide segmentation for a more optimal subregion segmentation followed by an informed greedy search to determine the minimum number of subregions required to modify the classifier's output based on attribution score. Extensive experiments on uncurated data from social networks emphasize the efficacy of our proposed method. We make our code available at: https://github.com/SecureAIAutonomyLab/ConditionalVLM

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.

Builds on

6 of 54 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  4. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  5. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  6. 2023Towards Language Models That Can See: Computer Vision Through the LENS of Natural Languagecited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PRJ: Perception-Retrieval-Judgement for Generated Images
  2. 2024UnsafeBench: Benchmarking Image Safety Classifiers on Real-World and AI-Generated Images
  3. 2025SafetyPairs: Isolating Safety Critical Image Features with Counterfactual Image Generation
  4. 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge for Image Safety without Human Labeling
  5. 2025HoliSafe: Holistic Safety Benchmarking and Modeling for Vision-Language Model
  6. 2026SafeCtrl: Region-Aware Safety Control for Text-to-Image Diffusion via Detect-Then-Suppress
  7. 2023Unsafe Diffusion: On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Models
  8. 2026Leave My Images Alone: Preventing Multi-Modal Large Language Models from Analyzing Images via Visual Prompt Injection