T2MAC: Targeted and Trusted Multi-Agent Communication through Selective Engagement and Evidence-Driven Integration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Communication stands as a potent mechanism to harmonize the behaviors of multiple agents. However, existing works primarily concentrate on broadcast communication, which not only lacks practicality, but also leads to information redundancy. This surplus, one-fits-all information could adversely impact the communication efficiency. Furthermore, existing works often resort to basic mechanisms to integrate observed and received information, impairing the learning process. To tackle these difficulties, we propose Targeted and Trusted Multi-Agent Communication (T2MAC), a straightforward yet effective method that enables agents to learn selective engagement and evidence-driven integration. With T2MAC, agents have the capability to craft individualized messages, pinpoint ideal communication windows, and engage with reliable partners, thereby refining communication efficiency. Following the reception of messages, the agents integrate information observed and received from different sources at an evidence level. This process enables agents to collectively use evidence garnered from multiple perspectives, fostering trusted and cooperative behaviors. We evaluate our method on a diverse set of cooperative multi-agent tasks, with varying difficulties, involving different scales and ranging from Hallway, MPE to SMAC. The experiments indicate that the proposed model not only surpasses the state-of-the-art methods in terms of cooperative performance and communication efficiency, but also exhibits impressive generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
- 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
- 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 201
- 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 170
10 more
- 2019Ensemble Distribution Distillationcited by 158
- 2018Learning when to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Taskscited by 114
- 2020Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy Gradientscited by 97
- 2019Learning to Schedule Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 89
- 2019Learning Nearly Decomposable Value Functions Via Communication Minimizationcited by 85
- 2019Learning Efficient Multi-agent Communication: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 60
- 2020Learning Individually Inferred Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 55
- 2019Efficient Communication in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Variance Based Controlcited by 46
- 2019Learning Agent Communication under Limited Bandwidth by Message Pruningcited by 31
- 2020Succinct and Robust Multi-Agent Communication With Temporal Message Controlcited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025Seven Security Challenges in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systemscited by 12
- 2025Interactive Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026Retaining Suboptimal Actions to Follow Shifting Optima in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2026LLM-Guided Communication for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2026Communication Gain and Delay Cost Under Cross-Timestep Delays in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026PEAR: Permutation-Equivariant Adaptive Routing Multi-Agent Debatecited by 0
- 2026HiComm: Hierarchical Communication for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026When to Communicate: Belief Distributions and KL Divergence for Principled Gating in Multi-Agent RLcited by 0
- 2026HiComm: Hierarchical Communication for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning28 Jun 2026
- 2026PEAR: Permutation-Equivariant Adaptive Routing Multi-Agent Debate26 May 2026
- 2026When to Communicate: Belief Distributions and KL Divergence for Principled Gating in Multi-Agent RL21 May 2026
- 2026LLM-Guided Communication for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning18 May 2026
- 2026Communication Gain and Delay Cost Under Cross-Timestep Delays in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning4 Apr 2026
- 2026Retaining Suboptimal Actions to Follow Shifting Optima in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning19 Feb 2026
- 2025Interactive Learning for LLM Reasoning30 Sep 2025
- 2025Seven Security Challenges in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems28 May 2025