Subjective Causality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We show that it is possible to understand and identify a decision maker's subjective causal judgements by observing her preferences over interventions. Following Pearl [2000], we represent causality using causal models (also called structural equations models), where the world is described by a collection of variables, related by equations. We show that if a preference relation over interventions satisfies certain axioms (related to standard axioms regarding counterfactuals), then we can define (i) a causal model, (ii) a probability capturing the decision-maker's uncertainty regarding the external factors in the world and (iii) a utility on outcomes such that each intervention is associated with an expected utility and such that intervention A is preferred to B iff the expected utility of A is greater than that of B. In addition, we characterize when the causal model is unique. Thus, our results allow a modeler to test the hypothesis that a decision maker's preferences are consistent with some causal model and to identify causal judgements from observed behavior.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2024.
Builds on
2 of 21 references.
References · 2
- 2021Language-based Decisionscited by 2
- 2023Sequential Language-based Decisionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.