mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating distribution shift in machine learning-augmented hybrid simulation

arXiv 2401.09259 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2024math.NA cs.NA math.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of distribution shift generally arising in machine-learning augmented hybrid simulation, where parts of simulation algorithms are replaced by data-driven surrogates. We first establish a mathematical framework to understand the structure of machine-learning augmented hybrid simulation problems, and the cause and effect of the associated distribution shift. We show correlations between distribution shift and simulation error both numerically and theoretically. Then, we propose a simple methodology based on tangent-space regularized estimator to control the distribution shift, thereby improving the long-term accuracy of the simulation results. In the linear dynamics case, we provide a thorough theoretical analysis to quantify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Moreover, we conduct several numerical experiments, including simulating a partially known reaction-diffusion equation and solving Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method with a data-driven pressure solver. In all cases, we observe marked improvements in simulation accuracy under the proposed method, especially for systems with high degrees of distribution shift, such as those with relatively strong non-linear reaction mechanisms, or flows at large Reynolds numbers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2024.

Builds on

26 of 70 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  5. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 840
  6. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  7. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
  8. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287
  9. 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
  10. 2017Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanicscited by 213
  11. 2022Failure-informed adaptive sampling for PINNscited by 64
  12. 2023A graph convolutional autoencoder approach to model order reduction for parametrized PDEscited by 44
14 more
  1. 2021Physics-Guided Deep Learning for Dynamical Systems: A Surveycited by 43
  2. 2018Active Learning of Uniformly Accurate Inter-atomic Potentials for Materials Simulationcited by 37
  3. 2020Deep Neural Networks for Nonlinear Model Order Reduction of Unsteady Flowscited by 36
  4. 2020OnsagerNet: Learning Stable and Interpretable Dynamics using a Generalized Onsager Principlecited by 35
  5. 2019Confidence Regions in Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Estimationcited by 24
  6. 2021Towards Robust Neural Networks via Close-loop Controlcited by 23
  7. 2021Learning optimal multigrid smoothers via neural networkscited by 17
  8. 2020A Data Driven Method for Computing Quasipotentialscited by 11
  9. 2023Coupling parameter and particle dynamics for adaptive sampling in Neural Galerkin schemescited by 10
  10. 2022Physics-informed Deep Super-resolution for Spatiotemporal Datacited by 9
  11. 2022Principled Acceleration of Iterative Numerical Methods Using Machine Learningcited by 6
  12. 2022Self-Healing Robust Neural Networks via Closed-Loop Controlcited by 5
  13. 2023Why should autoencoders work?cited by 3
  14. 2017DAGGER: A sequential algorithm for FDR control on DAGscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.