lpNTK: Better Generalisation with Less Data via Sample Interaction During Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although much research has been done on proposing new models or loss functions to improve the generalisation of artificial neural networks (ANNs), less attention has been directed to the impact of the training data on generalisation. In this work, we start from approximating the interaction between samples, i.e. how learning one sample would modify the model's prediction on other samples. Through analysing the terms involved in weight updates in supervised learning, we find that labels influence the interaction between samples. Therefore, we propose the labelled pseudo Neural Tangent Kernel (lpNTK) which takes label information into consideration when measuring the interactions between samples. We first prove that lpNTK asymptotically converges to the empirical neural tangent kernel in terms of the Frobenius norm under certain assumptions. Secondly, we illustrate how lpNTK helps to understand learning phenomena identified in previous work, specifically the learning difficulty of samples and forgetting events during learning. Moreover, we also show that using lpNTK to identify and remove poisoning training samples does not hurt the generalisation performance of ANNs.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2024.
Builds on
33 of 49 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 516
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
21 more
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2021When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentationscited by 260
- 2020Dataset Meta-Learning from Kernel Ridge-Regressioncited by 230
- 2021Dataset Distillation with Infinitely Wide Convolutional Networkscited by 218
- 2019Tensor Programs I: Wide Feedforward or Recurrent Neural Networks of Any Architecture are Gaussian Processescited by 151
- 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 147
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 143
- 2020Characterizing Structural Regularities of Labeled Data in Overparameterized Modelscited by 93
- 2020Compositional Languages Emerge in a Neural Iterated Learning Modelcited by 75
- 2020Countering Language Drift with Seeded Iterated Learningcited by 57
- 2021Tensor Programs IIb: Architectural Universality of Neural Tangent Kernel Training Dynamicscited by 57
- 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 49
- 2021Deep Active Learning by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 32
- 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
- 2019The Emergence of Compositional Languages for Numeric Concepts Through Iterated Learning in Neural Agentscited by 26
- 2020Towards NNGP-guided Neural Architecture Searchcited by 24
- 2021Iterated learning for emergent systematicity in VQAcited by 21
- 2022Better Supervisory Signals by Observing Learning Pathscited by 21
- 2021Multi-label Iterated Learning for Image Classification with Label Ambiguitycited by 19
- 2021Meta-Learning with Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 15
- 2022Lethal Dose Conjecture on Data Poisoningcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuningcited by 95
- 2025The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic Viewcited by 13
- 2024Understanding Simplicity Bias towards Compositional Mappings via Learning Dynamicscited by 5
- 2026Alignment Dynamics in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 2
- 2025Accumulative SGD Influence Estimation for Data Attributioncited by 1
- 2026Why Ghost Outputs Teach: A Kernel-Based Understanding of Subliminal Learningcited by 0
- 2026Why Ghost Outputs Teach: A Kernel-Based Understanding of Subliminal Learning20 Sep 2026
- 2026Alignment Dynamics in LLM Fine-Tuning18 May 2026
- 2025Accumulative SGD Influence Estimation for Data Attribution30 Oct 2025
- 2025The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic View5 Oct 2025
- 2024Understanding Simplicity Bias towards Compositional Mappings via Learning Dynamics15 Sep 2024
- 2024Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuning15 Jul 2024