mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Dynamical System Modeling through Interpretable Machine Learning Augmentations: A Case Study in Cathodic Electrophoretic Deposition

arXiv 2401.08414 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2024physics.comp-ph cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a comprehensive data-driven framework aimed at enhancing the modeling of physical systems, employing inference techniques and machine learning enhancements. As a demonstrative application, we pursue the modeling of cathodic electrophoretic deposition (EPD), commonly known as e-coating. Our approach illustrates a systematic procedure for enhancing physical models by identifying their limitations through inference on experimental data and introducing adaptable model enhancements to address these shortcomings. We begin by tackling the issue of model parameter identifiability, which reveals aspects of the model that require improvement. To address generalizability , we introduce modifications which also enhance identifiability. However, these modifications do not fully capture essential experimental behaviors. To overcome this limitation, we incorporate interpretable yet flexible augmentations into the baseline model. These augmentations are parameterized by simple fully-connected neural networks (FNNs), and we leverage machine learning tools, particularly Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs), to learn these augmentations. Our simulations demonstrate that the machine learning-augmented model more accurately captures observed behaviors and improves predictive accuracy. Nevertheless, we contend that while the model updates offer superior performance and capture the relevant physics, we can reduce off-line computational costs by eliminating certain dynamics without compromising accuracy or interpretability in downstream predictions of quantities of interest, particularly film thickness predictions. The entire process outlined here provides a structured approach to leverage data-driven methods. Firstly, it helps us comprehend the root causes of model inaccuracies, and secondly, it offers a principled method for enhancing model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2024.

Builds on

9 of 34 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  4. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  5. 2023Machine learning with data assimilation and uncertainty quantification for dynamical systems: a reviewcited by 74
  6. 2022Stabilized Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Long-Time Forecasting of Dynamical Systemscited by 50
  7. 2016Boosting Variational Inferencecited by 22
  8. 2021A practical tutorial on Variational Bayescited by 10
  9. 2022Near-optimal control of dynamical systems with neural ordinary differential equationscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.