mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Robustness of LLM-Synthetic Text Detectors for Academic Writing: A Comprehensive Analysis

arXiv 2401.08046 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) used by ChatGPT, has profoundly impacted the academic and broader community. While these models offer numerous advantages in terms of revolutionizing work and study methods, they have also garnered significant attention due to their potential negative consequences. One example is generating academic reports or papers with little to no human contribution. Consequently, researchers have focused on developing detectors to address the misuse of LLMs. However, most existing methods prioritize achieving higher accuracy on restricted datasets, neglecting the crucial aspect of generalizability. This limitation hinders their practical application in real-life scenarios where reliability is paramount. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of the impact of prompts on the text generated by LLMs and highlight the potential lack of robustness in one of the current state-of-the-art GPT detectors. To mitigate these issues concerning the misuse of LLMs in academic writing, we propose a reference-based Siamese detector named Synthetic-Siamese which takes a pair of texts, one as the inquiry and the other as the reference. Our method effectively addresses the lack of robustness of previous detectors (OpenAI detector and DetectGPT) and significantly improves the baseline performances in realistic academic writing scenarios by approximately 67% to 95%.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2024.

Builds on

6 of 9 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  3. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  4. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  5. 2019On the Use of ArXiv as a Datasetcited by 101
  6. 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publicationscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.