mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conformal Approach To Gaussian Process Surrogate Evaluation With Coverage Guarantees

arXiv 2401.07733 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gaussian processes (GPs) are a Bayesian machine learning approach widely used to construct surrogate models for the uncertainty quantification of computer simulation codes in industrial applications. It provides both a mean predictor and an estimate of the posterior prediction variance, the latter being used to produce Bayesian credibility intervals. Interpreting these intervals relies on the Gaussianity of the simulation model as well as the well-specification of the priors which are not always appropriate. We propose to address this issue with the help of conformal prediction. In the present work, a method for building adaptive cross-conformal prediction intervals is proposed by weighting the non-conformity score with the posterior standard deviation of the GP. The resulting conformal prediction intervals exhibit a level of adaptivity akin to Bayesian credibility sets and display a significant correlation with the surrogate model local approximation error, while being free from the underlying model assumptions and having frequentist coverage guarantees. These estimators can thus be used for evaluating the quality of a GP surrogate model and can assist a decision-maker in the choice of the best prior for the specific application of the GP. The performance of the method is illustrated through a panel of numerical examples based on various reference databases. Moreover, the potential applicability of the method is demonstrated in the context of surrogate modeling of an expensive-to-evaluate simulator of the clogging phenomenon in steam generators of nuclear reactors.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2024.

Builds on

15 of 46 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  2. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  3. 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 206
  4. 2018Deep UQ: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantificationcited by 81
  5. 2023Machine learning with data assimilation and uncertainty quantification for dynamical systems: a reviewcited by 74
  6. 2014Regression Conformal Prediction with Nearest Neighbourscited by 59
  7. 2022Bayesian Optimization with Conformal Prediction Setscited by 27
  8. 2017Fast Exact Conformalization of Lasso using Piecewise Linear Homotopycited by 20
  9. 2020Valid model-free spatial predictioncited by 19
  10. 2023Improving Adaptive Conformal Prediction Using Self-Supervised Learningcited by 17
  11. 2014Efficiency of conformalized ridge regressioncited by 13
  12. 2023Guaranteed Coverage Prediction Intervals with Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 12
3 more
  1. 2023Adaptive Conformal Regression with Jackknife+ Rescaled Scorescited by 8
  2. 2016Conformalized Kernel Ridge Regressioncited by 6
  3. 2023A comparison between Bayesian and ordinary kriging based on validation criteria: application to radiological characterisationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.