Stability Analysis of ChatGPT-based Sentiment Analysis in AI Quality Assurance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the era of large AI models, the complex architecture and vast parameters present substantial challenges for effective AI quality management (AIQM), e.g. large language model (LLM). This paper focuses on investigating the quality assurance of a specific LLM-based AI product--a ChatGPT-based sentiment analysis system. The study delves into stability issues related to both the operation and robustness of the expansive AI model on which ChatGPT is based. Experimental analysis is conducted using benchmark datasets for sentiment analysis. The results reveal that the constructed ChatGPT-based sentiment analysis system exhibits uncertainty, which is attributed to various operational factors. It demonstrated that the system also exhibits stability issues in handling conventional small text attacks involving robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2024.
Builds on
24 of 48 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
- 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
- 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 262
- 2023From Sparse to Soft Mixtures of Expertscited by 245
- 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 227
- 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 208
- 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
- 2023Automatically Auditing Large Language Models via Discrete Optimizationcited by 187
12 more
- 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 167
- 2023Exploring the Limits of ChatGPT for Query or Aspect-based Text Summarizationcited by 122
- 2023An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial Attackcited by 111
- 2023Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluationscited by 96
- 2023ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Textcited by 84
- 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
- 2023Review of Large Vision Models and Visual Prompt Engineeringcited by 77
- 2023Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remarkcited by 54
- 2023ChatGPT and Software Testing Education: Promises & Perilscited by 40
- 2022Medical Image Captioning via Generative Pretrained Transformerscited by 20
- 2023ChatGPT Participates in a Computer Science Examcited by 19
- 2023Ethical ChatGPT: Concerns, Challenges, and Commandmentscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.