BET: Explaining Deep Reinforcement Learning through The Error-Prone Decisions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the impressive capabilities of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents in many challenging scenarios, their black-box decision-making process significantly limits their deployment in safety-sensitive domains. Several previous self-interpretable works focus on revealing the critical states of the agent's decision. However, they cannot pinpoint the error-prone states. To address this issue, we propose a novel self-interpretable structure, named Backbone Extract Tree (BET), to better explain the agent's behavior by identify the error-prone states. At a high level, BET hypothesizes that states in which the agent consistently executes uniform decisions exhibit a reduced propensity for errors. To effectively model this phenomenon, BET expresses these states within neighborhoods, each defined by a curated set of representative states. Therefore, states positioned at a greater distance from these representative benchmarks are more prone to error. We evaluate BET in various popular RL environments and show its superiority over existing self-interpretable models in terms of explanation fidelity. Furthermore, we demonstrate a use case for providing explanations for the agents in StarCraft II, a sophisticated multi-agent cooperative game. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to explain such a complex scenarios using a fully transparent structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2024.
Builds on
13 of 28 references.
References · 13
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
- 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2017A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 265
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 201
- 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
- 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
- 2022Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2020Local and Global Explanations of Agent Behavior: Integrating Strategy Summaries with Saliency Mapscited by 30
- 2019A Reduction from Reinforcement Learning to No-Regret Online Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.