mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Zero-shot Generative Large Language Models for Systematic Review Screening Automation

arXiv 2401.06320 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2024cs.IR cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic reviews are crucial for evidence-based medicine as they comprehensively analyse published research findings on specific questions. Conducting such reviews is often resource- and time-intensive, especially in the screening phase, where abstracts of publications are assessed for inclusion in a review. This study investigates the effectiveness of using zero-shot large language models~(LLMs) for automatic screening. We evaluate the effectiveness of eight different LLMs and investigate a calibration technique that uses a predefined recall threshold to determine whether a publication should be included in a systematic review. Our comprehensive evaluation using five standard test collections shows that instruction fine-tuning plays an important role in screening, that calibration renders LLMs practical for achieving a targeted recall, and that combining both with an ensemble of zero-shot models saves significant screening time compared to state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2024.

Builds on

23 of 65 references.

References · 23

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  4. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  6. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  7. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
  8. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
  9. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
  10. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
  11. 2023QA-LoRA: Quantization-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 154
  12. 2023Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?cited by 54
11 more
  1. 2021Goldilocks: Just-Right Tuning of BERT for Technology-Assisted Reviewcited by 11
  2. 2023Generation-driven Contrastive Self-training for Zero-shot Text Classification with Instruction-following LLMcited by 11
  3. 2022From Little Things Big Things Grow: A Collection with Seed Studies for Medical Systematic Review Literature Searchcited by 10
  4. 2023Assessing the Ability of ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic Reviewscited by 10
  5. 2022Neural Rankers for Effective Screening Prioritisation in Medical Systematic Review Literature Searchcited by 9
  6. 2022Automated MeSH Term Suggestion for Effective Query Formulation in Systematic Reviews Literature Searchcited by 6
  7. 2023Bio-SIEVE: Exploring Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Systematic Review Automationcited by 6
  8. 2023Generating Natural Language Queries for More Effective Systematic Review Screening Prioritisationcited by 6
  9. 2018Technology Assisted Reviews: Finding the Last Few Relevant Documents by Asking Yes/No Questions to Reviewerscited by 4
  10. 2020Neural language models for text classification in evidence-based medicinecited by 3
  11. 2014From "Identical" to "Similar": Fusing Retrieved Lists Based on Inter-Document Similaritiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: