mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Augmented Surprise-guided Sequential Learning Framework for Predicting the Melt Pool Geometry

arXiv 2401.05579 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) has reshaped the manufacturing industry, offering benefits like intricate design, minimal waste, rapid prototyping, material versatility, and customized solutions. However, its full industry adoption faces hurdles, particularly in achieving consistent product quality. A crucial aspect for MAM's success is understanding the relationship between process parameters and melt pool characteristics. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into MAM is essential. Traditional machine learning (ML) methods, while effective, depend on large datasets to capture complex relationships, a significant challenge in MAM due to the extensive time and resources required for dataset creation. Our study introduces a novel surprise-guided sequential learning framework, SurpriseAF-BO, signaling a significant shift in MAM. This framework uses an iterative, adaptive learning process, modeling the dynamics between process parameters and melt pool characteristics with limited data, a key benefit in MAM's cyber manufacturing context. Compared to traditional ML models, our sequential learning method shows enhanced predictive accuracy for melt pool dimensions. Further improving our approach, we integrated a Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Network (CTGAN) into our framework, forming the CT-SurpriseAF-BO. This produces synthetic data resembling real experimental data, improving learning effectiveness. This enhancement boosts predictive precision without requiring additional physical experiments. Our study demonstrates the power of advanced data-driven techniques in cyber manufacturing and the substantial impact of sequential AI and ML, particularly in overcoming MAM's traditional challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2024.

Builds on

15 of 92 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  2. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  3. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  4. 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
  5. 2018MedGAN: Medical Image Translation using GANscited by 152
  6. 2018Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimizationcited by 113
  7. 2015Bayesian optimization for materials designcited by 78
  8. 2020Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs Survey): Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directionscited by 65
  9. 2022MeltpoolNet: Melt pool Characteristic Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Machine Learningcited by 19
  10. 2019A hierarchical expected improvement method for Bayesian optimizationcited by 13
  11. 2021Thermal Control of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  12. 2019Quality Aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 10
3 more
  1. 2021Towards Futuristic Autonomous Experimentation--A Surprise-Reacting Sequential Experiment Policycited by 4
  2. 2021Bayesian Optimisation for Sequential Experimental Design with Applications in Additive Manufacturingcited by 3
  3. 2023A Data Driven Sequential Learning Framework to Accelerate and Optimize Multi-Objective Manufacturing Decisionscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

6 papers.