mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HoloBeam: Learning Optimal Beamforming in Far-Field Holographic Metasurface Transceivers

arXiv 2401.05420 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2023eess.SP cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Holographic Metasurface Transceivers (HMTs) are emerging as cost-effective substitutes to large antenna arrays for beamforming in Millimeter and TeraHertz wave communication. However, to achieve desired channel gains through beamforming in HMT, phase-shifts of a large number of elements need to be appropriately set, which is challenging. Also, these optimal phase-shifts depend on the location of the receivers, which could be unknown. In this work, we develop a learning algorithm using a it fixed-budget multi-armed bandit framework to beamform and maximize received signal strength at the receiver for far-field regions. Our algorithm, named Algo exploits the parametric form of channel gains of the beams, which can be expressed in terms of two it phase-shifting parameters. Even after parameterization, the problem is still challenging as phase-shifting parameters take continuous values. To overcome this, itHB works with the discrete values of phase-shifting parameters and exploits their unimodal relations with channel gains to learn the optimal values faster. We upper bound the probability of itHB incorrectly identifying the (discrete) optimal phase-shift parameters in terms of the number of pilots used in learning. We show that this probability decays exponentially with the number of pilot signals. We demonstrate that itHB outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms through extensive simulations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2023.

Builds on

20 of 40 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 286
  2. 2016Tight (Lower) Bounds for the Fixed Budget Best Arm Identification Bandit Problemcited by 79
  3. 2018Intelligent Reflecting Surface Enhanced Wireless Network via Joint Active and Passive Beamformingcited by 46
  4. 2013Millimeter Wave Channel Modeling and Cellular Capacity Evaluationcited by 29
  5. 2019Holographic MIMO Surfaces for 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Trendscited by 20
  6. 2019Fast mmwave Beam Alignment via Correlated Bandit Learningcited by 10
  7. 2020Terahertz Massive MIMO with Holographic Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfacescited by 8
  8. 2021Beam Focusing for Near-Field Multi-User MIMO Communicationscited by 8
  9. 2020Physics-based Modeling and Scalable Optimization of Large Intelligent Reflecting Surfacescited by 5
  10. 2019Beam Training based on Dynamic Hierarchical Codebook for Millimeter Wave Massive MIMOcited by 3
  11. 2020Joint Beam Training and Positioning For Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces Assisted Millimeter Wave Communicationscited by 3
  12. 2022Fast Beam Alignment via Pure Exploration in Multi-armed Banditscited by 3
8 more
  1. 2019Path Loss in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Enabled Channelscited by 2
  2. 2021Channel Modeling and Channel Estimation for Holographic Massive MIMO with Planar Arrayscited by 2
  3. 2021Holographic Metasurface Antennas for Uplink Massive MIMO Systemscited by 2
  4. 2021Parametric Channel Estimation for LoS Dominated Holographic Massive MIMO Systemscited by 2
  5. 2022Multi-Armed Bandit Dynamic Beam Zooming for mmWave Alignment and Trackingcited by 1
  6. 2022Learning Optimal Phase-Shifts of Holographic Metasurface Transceiverscited by 1
  7. 2022UB3: Best Beam Identification in Millimeter Wave Systems via Pure Exploration Unimodal Banditscited by 1
  8. 2023A Tutorial on Holographic MIMO Communications--Part I: Channel Modeling and Channel Estimationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.