Collaborative Learning with Artificial Intelligence Speakers (CLAIS): Pre-Service Elementary Science Teachers' Responses to the Prototype
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This research aims to demonstrate that AI can function not only as a tool for learning, but also as an intelligent agent with which humans can engage in collaborative learning (CL) to change epistemic practices in science classrooms. We adopted a design and development research approach, following the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE) model, to prototype a tangible instructional system called Collaborative Learning with AI Speakers (CLAIS). The CLAIS system is designed to have 3-4 human learners join an AI speaker to form a small group, where humans and AI are considered as peers participating in the Jigsaw learning process. The development was carried out using the NUGU AI speaker platform. The CLAIS system was successfully implemented in a Science Education course session with 15 pre-service elementary science teachers. The participants evaluated the CLAIS system through mixed methods surveys as teachers, learners, peers, and users. Quantitative data showed that the participants' Intelligent-Technological, Pedagogical, And Content Knowledge was significantly increased after the CLAIS session, the perception of the CLAIS learning experience was positive, the peer assessment on AI speakers and human peers was different, and the user experience was ambivalent. Qualitative data showed that the participants anticipated future changes in the epistemic process in science classrooms, while acknowledging technical issues such as speech recognition performance and response latency. This study highlights the potential of Human-AI Collaboration for knowledge co-construction in authentic classroom settings and exemplify how AI could shape the future landscape of epistemic practices in the classroom.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.
Builds on
1 of 69 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Transforming Teachers' Roles and Agencies in the Era of Generative AI: Perceptions, Acceptance, Knowledge, and Practicescited by 8
- 2024Realizing Visual Question Answering for Education: GPT-4V as a Multimodal AIcited by 5
- 2025Human Experts' Evaluation of Generative AI for Contextualizing STEAM Education in the Global Southcited by 2
- 2025Improving Speech Recognition of Named Entities in Classroom Speech with LLM Revision and Phonetic-Semantic Contextcited by 0
- 2026The RIGID Framework: Research-Integrated, Generative AI-Mediated Instructional Designcited by 0
- 2026The RIGID Framework: Research-Integrated, Generative AI-Mediated Instructional Design13 Mar 2026
- 2025Human Experts' Evaluation of Generative AI for Contextualizing STEAM Education in the Global South23 Nov 2025
- 2025Improving Speech Recognition of Named Entities in Classroom Speech with LLM Revision and Phonetic-Semantic Context12 Jun 2025
- 2024Transforming Teachers' Roles and Agencies in the Era of Generative AI: Perceptions, Acceptance, Knowledge, and Practices3 Oct 2024
- 2024Realizing Visual Question Answering for Education: GPT-4V as a Multimodal AI12 May 2024