Music Genre Classification: A Comparative Analysis of CNN and XGBoost Approaches with Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and Mel Spectrograms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, various well-designed algorithms have empowered music platforms to provide content based on one's preferences. Music genres are defined through various aspects, including acoustic features and cultural considerations. Music genre classification works well with content-based filtering, which recommends content based on music similarity to users. Given a considerable dataset, one premise is automatic annotation using machine learning or deep learning methods that can effectively classify audio files. The effectiveness of systems largely depends on feature and model selection, as different architectures and features can facilitate each other and yield different results. In this study, we conduct a comparative study investigating the performances of three models: a proposed convolutional neural network (CNN), the VGG16 with fully connected layers (FC), and an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) approach on different features: 30-second Mel spectrogram and 3-second Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs). The results show that the MFCC XGBoost model outperformed the others. Furthermore, applying data segmentation in the data preprocessing phase can significantly enhance the performance of the CNNs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2024.
Builds on
2 of 10 references.
References · 2
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2020A Close Look at Deep Learning with Small Datacited by 54
Built on by
Not cited yet.