mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Simultaneous Task Allocation and Planning for Multi-Robots under Hierarchical Temporal Logic Specifications

arXiv 2401.04003 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.FLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research in robotic planning with temporal logic specifications, such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), has relied on single formulas. However, as task complexity increases, LTL formulas become lengthy, making them difficult to interpret and generate, and straining the computational capacities of planners. To address this, we introduce a hierarchical structure for a widely used specification type -- LTL on finite traces (LTLf). The resulting language, termed H-LTLf, is defined with both its syntax and semantics. We further prove that H-LTLf is more expressive than its standard "flat" counterparts. Moreover, we conducted a user study that compared the standard LTLf with our hierarchical version and found that users could more easily comprehend complex tasks using the hierarchical structure. We develop a search-based approach to synthesize plans for multi-robot systems, achieving simultaneous task allocation and planning. This method approximates the search space by loosely interconnected sub-spaces, each corresponding to an LTLf specification. The search primarily focuses on a single sub-space, transitioning to another under conditions determined by the decomposition of automata. We develop multiple heuristics to significantly expedite the search. Our theoretical analysis, conducted under mild assumptions, addresses completeness and optimality. Compared to existing methods used in various simulators for service tasks, our approach improves planning times while maintaining comparable solution quality.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2024.

Builds on

22 of 97 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  2. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  3. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
  4. 2021Integrated Task Assignment and Path Planning for Capacitated Multi-Agent Pickup and Deliverycited by 29
  5. 2016Optimal Target Assignment and Path Finding for Teams of Agentscited by 24
  6. 2018STyLuS*: A Temporal Logic Optimal Control Synthesis Algorithm for Large-Scale Multi-Robot Systemscited by 24
  7. 2015Optimal Multi-Robot Path Planning on Graphs: Complete Algorithms and Effective Heuristicscited by 12
  8. 2020Perception-Based Temporal Logic Planning in Uncertain Semantic Mapscited by 12
  9. 2019An Abstraction-Free Method for Multi-Robot Temporal Logic Optimal Control Synthesiscited by 11
  10. 2021Solving Simultaneous Target Assignment and Path Planning Efficiently with Time-Independent Executioncited by 9
  11. 2023Temporal Logic Motion Planning with Convex Optimization via Graphs of Convex Setscited by 9
  12. 2018Multirobot Coordination with Counting Temporal Logicscited by 7
10 more
  1. 2016Multi-Agent Planning under Local LTL Specifications and Event-Based Synchronizationcited by 5
  2. 2018Simultaneous Task Allocation and Planning Under Uncertaintycited by 5
  3. 2020Fast Decomposition of Temporal Logic Specifications for Heterogeneous Teamscited by 5
  4. 2022Time Minimization and Online Synchronization for Multi-agent Systems under Collaborative Temporal Taskscited by 4
  5. 2017Sampling-Based Optimal Control Synthesis for Multi-Robot Systems under Global Temporal Taskscited by 3
  6. 2022Hypergraph-based Multi-Robot Task and Motion Planningcited by 3
  7. 2023Decomposition-based Hierarchical Task Allocation and Planning for Multi-Robots under Hierarchical Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 3
  8. 2021Distributed motion coordination for multi-robot systems under LTL specificationscited by 2
  9. 2022A MIP-Based Approach for Multi-Robot Geometric Task-and-Motion Planningcited by 2
  10. 2017Interval vs. Point Temporal Logic Model Checking: an Expressiveness Comparisoncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.