mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detecting Anomalies in Blockchain Transactions using Machine Learning Classifiers and Explainability Analysis

arXiv 2401.03530 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the use of Blockchain for digital payments continues to rise in popularity, it also becomes susceptible to various malicious attacks. Successfully detecting anomalies within Blockchain transactions is essential for bolstering trust in digital payments. However, the task of anomaly detection in Blockchain transaction data is challenging due to the infrequent occurrence of illicit transactions. Although several studies have been conducted in the field, a limitation persists: the lack of explanations for the model's predictions. This study seeks to overcome this limitation by integrating eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques and anomaly rules into tree-based ensemble classifiers for detecting anomalous Bitcoin transactions. The Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method is employed to measure the contribution of each feature, and it is compatible with ensemble models. Moreover, we present rules for interpreting whether a Bitcoin transaction is anomalous or not. Additionally, we have introduced an under-sampling algorithm named XGBCLUS, designed to balance anomalous and non-anomalous transaction data. This algorithm is compared against other commonly used under-sampling and over-sampling techniques. Finally, the outcomes of various tree-based single classifiers are compared with those of stacking and voting ensemble classifiers. Our experimental results demonstrate that: (i) XGBCLUS enhances TPR and ROC-AUC scores compared to state-of-the-art under-sampling and over-sampling techniques, and (ii) our proposed ensemble classifiers outperform traditional single tree-based machine learning classifiers in terms of accuracy, TPR, and FPR scores.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2024.

Builds on

10 of 59 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2015A Random Forest Guided Tourcited by 168
  4. 2020Machine learning methods to detect money laundering in the Bitcoin blockchain in the presence of label scarcitycited by 21
  5. 2021Anomaly Detection in Blockchain Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 16
  6. 2019Building an Efficient Intrusion Detection System Based on Feature Selection and Ensemble Classifiercited by 14
  7. 2019Blockchain Technology Overviewcited by 12
  8. 2016Anomaly Detection in Bitcoin Network Using Unsupervised Learning Methodscited by 11
  9. 2021Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Pharmacovigilance: What Features Are Important When Predicting Adverse Outcomes?cited by 5
  10. 2019Blockchain Intelligence: When Blockchain Meets Artificial Intelligencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.