SPQR: Controlling Q-ensemble Independence with Spiked Random Model for Reinforcement Learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations
Abstract (arXiv)
Alleviating overestimation bias is a critical challenge for deep reinforcement learning to achieve successful performance on more complex tasks or offline datasets containing out-of-distribution data. In order to overcome overestimation bias, ensemble methods for Q-learning have been investigated to exploit the diversity of multiple Q-functions. Since network initialization has been the predominant approach to promote diversity in Q-functions, heuristically designed diversity injection methods have been studied in the literature. However, previous studies have not attempted to approach guaranteed independence over an ensemble from a theoretical perspective. By introducing a novel regularization loss for Q-ensemble independence based on random matrix theory, we propose spiked Wishart Q-ensemble independence regularization (SPQR) for reinforcement learning. Specifically, we modify the intractable hypothesis testing criterion for the Q-ensemble independence into a tractable KL divergence between the spectral distribution of the Q-ensemble and the target Wigner's semicircle distribution. We implement SPQR in several online and offline ensemble Q-learning algorithms. In the experiments, SPQR outperforms the baseline algorithms in both online and offline RL benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2024.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2021Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemblecited by 302
- 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 288
- 2020SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 152
- 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
- 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
- 2020Random Matrix Theory Proves that Deep Learning Representations of GAN-data Behave as Gaussian Mixturescited by 47
- 2018The Dynamics of Learning: A Random Matrix Approachcited by 15
4 more
- 2022DNS: Determinantal Point Process Based Neural Network Sampler for Ensemble Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2021Appearance of Random Matrix Theory in Deep Learningcited by 7
- 2021Detection of Signal in the Spiked Rectangular Modelscited by 4
- 2023Accelerating Policy Gradient by Estimating Value Function from Prior Computation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Double Actor-Critic with TD Error-Driven Regularization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025Adaptive AI-based Decentralized Resource Management in the Cloud-Edge Continuumcited by 1
- 2024Hypercube Policy Regularization Framework for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2025Free Random Projection for In-Context Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2025Learning Robust Visuomotor Policies via Dynamics Alignmentcited by 0
- 2025Mitigating Estimation Bias with Representation Learning in TD Error-Driven Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Lyapunov-Guided Self-Alignment: Test-Time Adaptation for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Understanding and Stabilizing Deep Q-Learning via Controlled Bootstrapping and Regulated Value Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Understanding and Stabilizing Deep Q-Learning via Controlled Bootstrapping and Regulated Value Dynamics17 Aug 2026
- 2026Lyapunov-Guided Self-Alignment: Test-Time Adaptation for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning29 Apr 2026
- 2025Mitigating Estimation Bias with Representation Learning in TD Error-Driven Regularization20 Nov 2025
- 2025Learning Robust Visuomotor Policies via Dynamics Alignment31 Oct 2025
- 2025Free Random Projection for In-Context Reinforcement Learning9 Apr 2025
- 2025Adaptive AI-based Decentralized Resource Management in the Cloud-Edge Continuum27 Jan 2025
- 2024Hypercube Policy Regularization Framework for Offline Reinforcement Learning7 Nov 2024
- 2024Double Actor-Critic with TD Error-Driven Regularization in Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Dual Ensembled Multiagent Q-Learning with Hypernet Regularizer
- 2025Sat-EnQ: Satisficing Ensembles of Weak Q-Learners for Reliable and Compute-Efficient Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Entropy-regularized Diffusion Policy with Q-Ensembles for Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2025GB-DQN: Gradient Boosted DQN Models for Non-stationary Reinforcement Learning
- 2025SALE-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Ensemble Q-Networks
- 2024Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Contextualized Hybrid Ensemble Q-learning: Learning Fast with Control Priors
- 2025Quantile Q-Learning: Revisiting Offline Extreme Q-Learning with Quantile Regression