Adaptive Boosting with Fairness-aware Reweighting Technique for Fair Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning methods based on AdaBoost have been widely applied to various classification problems across many mission-critical applications including healthcare, law and finance. However, there is a growing concern about the unfairness and discrimination of data-driven classification models, which is inevitable for classical algorithms including AdaBoost. In order to achieve fair classification, a novel fair AdaBoost (FAB) approach is proposed that is an interpretable fairness-improving variant of AdaBoost. We mainly investigate binary classification problems and focus on the fairness of three different indicators (i.e., accuracy, false positive rate and false negative rate). By utilizing a fairness-aware reweighting technique for base classifiers, the proposed FAB approach can achieve fair classification while maintaining the advantage of AdaBoost with negligible sacrifice of predictive performance. In addition, a hyperparameter is introduced in FAB to show preferences for the fairness-accuracy trade-off. An upper bound for the target loss function that quantifies error rate and unfairness is theoretically derived for FAB, which provides a strict theoretical support for the fairness-improving methods designed for AdaBoost. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on three real-world datasets (i.e., Adult, COMPAS and HSLS) with respect to the three fairness indicators. The results are accordant with theoretic analyses, and show that (i) FAB significantly improves classification fairness at a small cost of accuracy compared with AdaBoost; and (ii) FAB outperforms state-of-the-art fair classification methods including equalized odds method, exponentiated gradient method, and disparate mistreatment method in terms of the fairness-accuracy trade-off.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2024.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2016A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracycited by 73
- 2020Applications of deep learning in stock market prediction: recent progresscited by 51
- 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
- 2015Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Predictioncited by 44
4 more
- 2020Fair Active Learningcited by 30
- 2021Fairness without Imputation: A Decision Tree Approach for Fair Prediction with Missing Valuescited by 24
- 2016Achieving non-discrimination in data releasecited by 23
- 2021Through the Data Management Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Fair Classificationcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.