Mining Temporal Attack Patterns from Cyberthreat Intelligence Reports
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Defending from cyberattacks requires practitioners to operate on high-level adversary behavior. Cyberthreat intelligence (CTI) reports on past cyberattack incidents describe the chain of malicious actions with respect to time. To avoid repeating cyberattack incidents, practitioners must proactively identify and defend against recurring chain of actions - which we refer to as temporal attack patterns. Automatically mining the patterns among actions provides structured and actionable information on the adversary behavior of past cyberattacks. The goal of this paper is to aid security practitioners in prioritizing and proactive defense against cyberattacks by mining temporal attack patterns from cyberthreat intelligence reports. To this end, we propose ChronoCTI, an automated pipeline for mining temporal attack patterns from cyberthreat intelligence (CTI) reports of past cyberattacks. To construct ChronoCTI, we build the ground truth dataset of temporal attack patterns and apply state-of-the-art large language models, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques. We apply ChronoCTI on a set of 713 CTI reports, where we identify 124 temporal attack patterns - which we categorize into nine pattern categories. We identify that the most prevalent pattern category is to trick victim users into executing malicious code to initiate the attack, followed by bypassing the anti-malware system in the victim network. Based on the observed patterns, we advocate organizations to train users about cybersecurity best practices, introduce immutable operating systems with limited functionalities, and enforce multi-user authentications. Moreover, we advocate practitioners to leverage the automated mining capability of ChronoCTI and design countermeasures against the recurring attack patterns.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2024.
Builds on
13 of 101 references.
References · 13
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2019Macro F1 and Macro F1cited by 70
- 2018HOLMES: Real-time APT Detection through Correlation of Suspicious Information Flowscited by 43
- 2021AttacKG: Constructing Technique Knowledge Graph from Cyber Threat Intelligence Reportscited by 31
- 2019POIROT: Aligning Attack Behavior with Kernel Audit Records for Cyber Threat Huntingcited by 27
- 2021EXTRACTOR: Extracting Attack Behavior from Threat Reportscited by 19
- 2020Automated Retrieval of ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques for Cyber Threat Reportscited by 16
- 2021What are the attackers doing now? Automating cyber threat intelligence extraction from text on pace with the changing threat landscape: A surveycited by 14
- 2020Enabling Efficient Cyber Threat Hunting With Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 12
- 2022Automatic Mapping of Unstructured Cyber Threat Intelligence: An Experimental Studycited by 11
- 2020Learning the Associations of MITRE ATT&CK Adversarial Techniquescited by 6
1 more
- 2022Investigating co-occurrences of MITRE ATT&CK Techniquescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.