Act as You Learn: Adaptive Decision-Making in Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A fundamental (and largely open) challenge in sequential decision-making is dealing with non-stationary environments, where exogenous environmental conditions change over time. Such problems are traditionally modeled as non-stationary Markov decision processes (NSMDP). However, existing approaches for decision-making in NSMDPs have two major shortcomings: first, they assume that the updated environmental dynamics at the current time are known (although future dynamics can change); and second, planning is largely pessimistic, i.e., the agent acts ``safely'' to account for the non-stationary evolution of the environment. We argue that both these assumptions are invalid in practice -- updated environmental conditions are rarely known, and as the agent interacts with the environment, it can learn about the updated dynamics and avoid being pessimistic, at least in states whose dynamics it is confident about. We present a heuristic search algorithm called textitAdaptive Monte Carlo Tree Search (ADA-MCTS) that addresses these challenges. We show that the agent can learn the updated dynamics of the environment over time and then act as it learns, i.e., if the agent is in a region of the state space about which it has updated knowledge, it can avoid being pessimistic. To quantify ``updated knowledge,'' we disintegrate the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in the agent's updated belief and show how the agent can use these estimates for decision-making. We compare the proposed approach with the multiple state-of-the-art approaches in decision-making across multiple well-established open-source problems and empirically show that our approach is faster and highly adaptive without sacrificing safety.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2024.
Builds on
9 of 20 references.
References · 9
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2020Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Planning of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 101
- 2022Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environmentscited by 54
- 2019Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes, a Worst-Case Approach using Model-Based Reinforcement Learning, Extended versioncited by 36
- 2017Robust and Efficient Transfer Learning with Hidden-Parameter Markov Decision Processescited by 28
- 2020A Review of Incident Prediction, Resource Allocation, and Dispatch Models for Emergency Managementcited by 9
- 2023Dynamic Simplex: Balancing Safety and Performance in Autonomous Cyber Physical Systemscited by 3
- 2023Safety-Assured Speculative Planning with Adaptive Predictioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Scalable Decision-Making in Stochastic Environments through Learned Temporal Abstractioncited by 4
- 2024Shrinking POMCP: A Framework for Real-Time UAV Search and Rescuecited by 2
- 2025SNAPE-PM: Building and Utilizing Dynamic Partner Models for Adaptive Explanation Generationcited by 0
- 2026Toward Template-Free Explainability for Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 0
- 2026Toward Template-Free Explainability for Monte Carlo Tree Search15 May 2026
- 2025SNAPE-PM: Building and Utilizing Dynamic Partner Models for Adaptive Explanation Generation19 May 2025
- 2025Scalable Decision-Making in Stochastic Environments through Learned Temporal Abstraction28 Feb 2025
- 2024Shrinking POMCP: A Framework for Real-Time UAV Search and Rescue20 Nov 2024