Automatic hip osteoarthritis grading with uncertainty estimation from computed tomography using digitally-reconstructed radiographs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Progression of hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) leads to pain and disability, likely leading to surgical treatment such as hip arthroplasty at the terminal stage. The severity of hip OA is often classified using the Crowe and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classifications. However, as the classification is subjective, we aimed to develop an automated approach to classify the disease severity based on the two grades using digitally-reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) from CT images. Automatic grading of the hip OA severity was performed using deep learning-based models. The models were trained to predict the disease grade using two grading schemes, i.e., predicting the Crowe and KL grades separately, and predicting a new ordinal label combining both grades and representing the disease progression of hip OA. The models were trained in classification and regression settings. In addition, the model uncertainty was estimated and validated as a predictor of classification accuracy. The models were trained and validated on a database of 197 hip OA patients, and externally validated on 52 patients. The model accuracy was evaluated using exact class accuracy (ECA), one-neighbor class accuracy (ONCA), and balanced accuracy.The deep learning models produced a comparable accuracy of approximately 0.65 (ECA) and 0.95 (ONCA) in the classification and regression settings. The model uncertainty was significantly larger in cases with large classification errors (P<6e-3). In this study, an automatic approach for grading hip OA severity from CT images was developed. The models have shown comparable performance with high ONCA, which facilitates automated grading in large-scale CT databases and indicates the potential for further disease progression analysis. Classification accuracy was correlated with the model uncertainty, which would allow for the prediction of classification errors.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2023.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
- 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 558
- 2018Concurrent Spatial and Channel Squeeze & Excitation in Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 120
- 2022Transformers in Medical Image Analysis: A Reviewcited by 41
3 more
- 2019Automated Muscle Segmentation from Clinical CT using Bayesian U-Net for Personalized Musculoskeletal Modelingcited by 22
- 2022Temporal Context Matters: Enhancing Single Image Prediction with Disease Progression Representationscited by 8
- 2018Reconciling Feature-Reuse and Overfitting in DenseNet with Specialized Dropoutcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.