mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for Spanish Language in Undergraduate Admissions Exams

arXiv 2312.16845 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study evaluates the performance of large language models, specifically GPT-3.5 and BARD (supported by Gemini Pro model), in undergraduate admissions exams proposed by the National Polytechnic Institute in Mexico. The exams cover Engineering/Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological and Medical Sciences, and Social and Administrative Sciences. Both models demonstrated proficiency, exceeding the minimum acceptance scores for respective academic programs to up to 75% for some academic programs. GPT-3.5 outperformed BARD in Mathematics and Physics, while BARD performed better in History and questions related to factual information. Overall, GPT-3.5 marginally surpassed BARD with scores of 60.94% and 60.42%, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2023.

Builds on

4 of 18 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963

Built on by

Not cited yet.