Can ChatGPT Read Who You Are?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and psychology, particularly in personality assessment, represents an important emerging area of research. Accurate personality trait estimation is crucial not only for enhancing personalization in human-computer interaction but also for a wide variety of applications ranging from mental health to education. This paper analyzes the capability of a generic chatbot, ChatGPT, to effectively infer personality traits from short texts. We report the results of a comprehensive user study featuring texts written in Czech by a representative population sample of 155 participants. Their self-assessments based on the Big Five Inventory (BFI) questionnaire serve as the ground truth. We compare the personality trait estimations made by ChatGPT against those by human raters and report ChatGPT's competitive performance in inferring personality traits from text. We also uncover a 'positivity bias' in ChatGPT's assessments across all personality dimensions and explore the impact of prompt composition on accuracy. This work contributes to the understanding of AI capabilities in psychological assessment, highlighting both the potential and limitations of using large language models for personality inference. Our research underscores the importance of responsible AI development, considering ethical implications such as privacy, consent, autonomy, and bias in AI applications.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2023.
Builds on
7 of 51 references.
References · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2023ChatIE: Zero-Shot Information Extraction via Chatting with ChatGPTcited by 250
- 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 245
- 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Personality Recognizer? A Preliminary Studycited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2026Dynamic Personality Adaptation in Large Language Models via State Machinescited by 2
- 2024The use of GPT-4o and Other Large Language Models for the Improvement and Design of Self-Assessment Scales for Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Skillscited by 1
- 2025Mind Reading or Misreading? LLMs on the Big Five Personality Testcited by 0
- 2026LEX-EC: A Lexical Evidence-Channel Audit Framework for Zero-Shot LLM Personality Classification in Black-Box Settingscited by 0
- 2026Thinking Less to Simulate Better: Intuitive Prompting Improves LLM Agents Simulating Individual Social Media Reactions, Including Unfamiliar Contentcited by 0
- 2026Thinking Less to Simulate Better: Intuitive Prompting Improves LLM Agents Simulating Individual Social Media Reactions, Including Unfamiliar Content24 Sep 2026
- 2026LEX-EC: A Lexical Evidence-Channel Audit Framework for Zero-Shot LLM Personality Classification in Black-Box Settings27 Jul 2026
- 2026Dynamic Personality Adaptation in Large Language Models via State Machines25 Feb 2026
- 2025Mind Reading or Misreading? LLMs on the Big Five Personality Test28 Nov 2025
- 2024The use of GPT-4o and Other Large Language Models for the Improvement and Design of Self-Assessment Scales for Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Skills21 Sep 2024