mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The State of Documentation Practices of Third-party Machine Learning Models and Datasets

arXiv 2312.15058 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2023cs.SE cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model stores offer third-party ML models and datasets for easy project integration, minimizing coding efforts. One might hope to find detailed specifications of these models and datasets in the documentation, leveraging documentation standards such as model and dataset cards. In this study, we use statistical analysis and hybrid card sorting to assess the state of the practice of documenting model cards and dataset cards in one of the largest model stores in use today--Hugging Face (HF). Our findings show that only 21,902 models (39.62%) and 1,925 datasets (28.48%) have documentation. Furthermore, we observe inconsistency in ethics and transparency-related documentation for ML models and datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2023.

Builds on

7 of 15 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  2. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 152
  3. 2021Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and Processcited by 56
  4. 2023Data Quality for Software Vulnerability Datasetscited by 51
  5. 2023An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Model Reuse in the Hugging Face Deep Learning Model Registrycited by 47
  6. 2021Reusable Templates and Guides For Documenting Datasets and Models for Natural Language Processing and Generation: A Case Study of the HuggingFace and GEM Data and Model Cardscited by 24
  7. 2022Aspirations and Practice of Model Documentation: Moving the Needle with Nudging and Traceabilitycited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.