Democratize with Care: The need for fairness specific features in user-interface based open source AutoML tools
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI is increasingly playing a pivotal role in businesses and organizations, impacting the outcomes and interests of human users. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) streamlines the machine learning model development process by automating repetitive tasks and making data-driven decisions, enabling even non-experts to construct high-quality models efficiently. This democratization allows more users (including non-experts) to access and utilize state-of-the-art machine-learning expertise. However, AutoML tools may also propagate bias in the way these tools handle the data, model choices, and optimization approaches adopted. We conducted an experimental study of User-interface-based open source AutoML tools (DataRobot, H2O Studio, Dataiku, and Rapidminer Studio) to examine if they had features to assist users in developing fairness-aware machine learning models. The experiments covered the following considerations for the evaluation of features: understanding use case context, data representation, feature relevance and sensitivity, data bias and preprocessing techniques, data handling capabilities, training-testing split, hyperparameter handling, and constraints, fairness-oriented model development, explainability and ability to download and edit models by the user. The results revealed inadequacies in features that could support in fairness-aware model development. Further, the results also highlight the need to establish certain essential features for promoting fairness in AutoML tools.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2023.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
- 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
- 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
- 2020Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from Datacited by 54
- 2022AutoBalance: Optimized Loss Functions for Imbalanced Datacited by 49
- 2023Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystemcited by 49
- 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
- 2019Fairness Assessment for Artificial Intelligence in Financial Industrycited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.