mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated speech audiometry: Can it work using open-source pre-trained Kaldi-NL automatic speech recognition?

arXiv 2312.12269 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A practical speech audiometry tool is the digits-in-noise (DIN) test for hearing screening of populations of varying ages and hearing status. The test is usually conducted by a human supervisor (e.g., clinician), who scores the responses spoken by the listener, or online, where a software scores the responses entered by the listener. The test has 24 digit-triplets presented in an adaptive staircase procedure, resulting in a speech reception threshold (SRT). We propose an alternative automated DIN test setup that can evaluate spoken responses whilst conducted without a human supervisor, using the open-source automatic speech recognition toolkit, Kaldi-NL. Thirty self-reported normal-hearing Dutch adults (19-64 years) completed one DIN+Kaldi-NL test. Their spoken responses were recorded, and used for evaluating the transcript of decoded responses by Kaldi-NL. Study 1 evaluated the Kaldi-NL performance through its word error rate (WER), percentage of summed decoding errors regarding only digits found in the transcript compared to the total number of digits present in the spoken responses. Average WER across participants was 5.0% (range 0 - 48%, SD = 8.8%), with average decoding errors in three triplets per participant. Study 2 analysed the effect that triplets with decoding errors from Kaldi-NL had on the DIN test output (SRT), using bootstrapping simulations. Previous research indicated 0.70 dB as the typical within-subject SRT variability for normal-hearing adults. Study 2 showed that up to four triplets with decoding errors produce SRT variations within this range, suggesting that our proposed setup could be feasible for clinical applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2023.

Builds on

4 of 55 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
  2. 2017State-of-the-art Speech Recognition With Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 196
  3. 2018Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attentioncited by 138
  4. 2019Automatic Speech Recognition Services: Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Usabilitycited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.