mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Trade-off between the Number of Nodes and the Number of Trees in a Random Forest

arXiv 2312.11540 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we focus on the prediction phase of a random forest and study the problem of representing a bag of decision trees using a smaller bag of decision trees, where we only consider binary decision problems on the binary domain and simple decision trees in which an internal node is limited to querying the Boolean value of a single variable. As a main result, we show that the majority function of n variables can be represented by a bag of T (< n) decision trees each with polynomial size if n-T is a constant, where n and T must be odd (in order to avoid the tie break). We also show that a bag of n decision trees can be represented by a bag of T decision trees each with polynomial size if n-T is a constant and a small classification error is allowed. A related result on the k-out-of-n functions is presented too.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2023.

Builds on

4 of 18 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Trading Complexity for Sparsity in Random Forest Explanationscited by 32
  2. 2018On PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Random Forestscited by 10
  3. 2021When are Deep Networks really better than Decision Forests at small sample sizes, and how?cited by 6
  4. 2013Improved bounds for the randomized decision tree complexity of recursive majoritycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.