mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved Differentially Private and Lazy Online Convex Optimization

arXiv 2312.11534 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2023cs.CR cs.DS cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the task of (ε, δ)-differentially private online convex optimization (OCO). In the online setting, the release of each distinct decision or iterate carries with it the potential for privacy loss. This problem has a long history of research starting with Jain et al. [2012] and the best known results for the regime of ε not being very small are presented in Agarwal et al. [2023]. In this paper we improve upon the results of Agarwal et al. [2023] in terms of the dimension factors as well as removing the requirement of smoothness. Our results are now the best known rates for DP-OCO in this regime. Our algorithms builds upon the work of [Asi et al., 2023] which introduced the idea of explicitly limiting the number of switches via rejection sampling. The main innovation in our algorithm is the use of sampling from a strongly log-concave density which allows us to trade-off the dimension factors better leading to improved results.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  2. 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
  3. 2022Private Convex Optimization via Exponential Mechanismcited by 47
  4. 2017The Price of Differential Privacy For Online Learningcited by 44
  5. 2018Online learning over a finite action set with limited switchingcited by 21
  6. 2022Private Online Prediction from Experts: Separations and Faster Ratescited by 17
  7. 2021Lazy OCO: Online Convex Optimization on a Switching Budgetcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.