mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extracting Interpretable Local and Global Representations from Attention on Time Series

arXiv 2312.11466 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper targets two transformer attention based interpretability methods working with local abstraction and global representation, in the context of time series data. We distinguish local and global contexts, and provide a comprehensive framework for both general interpretation options. We discuss their specific instantiation via different methods in detail, also outlining their respective computational implementation and abstraction variants. Furthermore, we provide extensive experimentation demonstrating the efficacy of the presented approaches. In particular, we perform our experiments using a selection of univariate datasets from the UCR UEA time series repository where we both assess the performance of the proposed approaches, as well as their impact on explainability and interpretability/complexity. Here, with an extensive analysis of hyperparameters, the presented approaches demonstrate an significant improvement in interpretability/complexity, while capturing many core decisions of and maintaining a similar performance to the baseline model. Finally, we draw general conclusions outlining and guiding the application of the presented methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2023.

Builds on

31 of 65 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  6. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  7. 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 790
  8. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  9. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 761
  10. 2019Enhancing the Locality and Breaking the Memory Bottleneck of Transformer on Time Series Forecastingcited by 607
  11. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
  12. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
19 more
  1. 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
  2. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
  3. 2021Focal Self-attention for Local-Global Interactions in Vision Transformerscited by 288
  4. 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 261
  5. 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
  6. 2021Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyondcited by 118
  7. 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
  8. 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 106
  9. 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
  10. 2020Language Models are Open Knowledge Graphscited by 95
  11. 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
  12. 2021Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) on TimeSeries Data: A Surveycited by 72
  13. 2021Leveraging redundancy in attention with Reuse Transformerscited by 33
  14. 2021XAI Handbook: Towards a Unified Framework for Explainable AIcited by 14
  15. 2019Understanding Multi-Head Attention in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 12
  16. 2019Visualizing Attention in Transformer-Based Language Representation Modelscited by 8
  17. 2019Do Transformer Attention Heads Provide Transparency in Abstractive Summarization?cited by 6
  18. 2020AttViz: Online exploration of self-attention for transparent neural language modelingcited by 2
  19. 2013API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn projectcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.