mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Cross-Subject Data Splitting for Brain-to-Text Decoding

arXiv 2312.10987 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent major milestones have successfully reconstructed natural language from non-invasive brain signals (e.g. functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalogram (EEG)) across subjects. However, we find current dataset splitting strategies for cross-subject brain-to-text decoding are wrong. Specifically, we first demonstrate that all current splitting methods suffer from data leakage problem, which refers to the leakage of validation and test data into training set, resulting in significant overfitting and overestimation of decoding models. In this study, we develop a right cross-subject data splitting criterion without data leakage for decoding fMRI and EEG signal to text. Some SOTA brain-to-text decoding models are re-evaluated correctly with the proposed criterion for further research.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.

Builds on

5 of 29 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  2. 2022Decoding speech perception from non-invasive brain recordingscited by 130
  3. 2021Open Vocabulary Electroencephalography-To-Text Decoding and Zero-shot Sentiment Classificationcited by 67
  4. 2018BOLD5000: A public fMRI dataset of 5000 imagescited by 63
  5. 2023UniCoRN: Unified Cognitive Signal ReconstructioN bridging cognitive signals and human languagecited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.