mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GINN-LP: A Growing Interpretable Neural Network for Discovering Multivariate Laurent Polynomial Equations

arXiv 2312.10913 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional machine learning is generally treated as a black-box optimization problem and does not typically produce interpretable functions that connect inputs and outputs. However, the ability to discover such interpretable functions is desirable. In this work, we propose GINN-LP, an interpretable neural network to discover the form and coefficients of the underlying equation of a dataset, when the equation is assumed to take the form of a multivariate Laurent Polynomial. This is facilitated by a new type of interpretable neural network block, named the "power-term approximator block", consisting of logarithmic and exponential activation functions. GINN-LP is end-to-end differentiable, making it possible to use backpropagation for training. We propose a neural network growth strategy that will enable finding the suitable number of terms in the Laurent polynomial that represents the data, along with sparsity regularization to promote the discovery of concise equations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first model that can discover arbitrary multivariate Laurent polynomial terms without any prior information on the order. Our approach is first evaluated on a subset of data used in SRBench, a benchmark for symbolic regression. We first show that GINN-LP outperforms the state-of-the-art symbolic regression methods on datasets generated using 48 real-world equations in the form of multivariate Laurent polynomials. Next, we propose an ensemble method that combines our method with a high-performing symbolic regression method, enabling us to discover non-Laurent polynomial equations. We achieve state-of-the-art results in equation discovery, showing an absolute improvement of 7.1% over the best contender, by applying this ensemble method to 113 datasets within SRBench with known ground-truth equations.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 37 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  2. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  3. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  4. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 208
  5. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  6. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  7. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  8. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 140
  9. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 139
  10. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  11. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
  12. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
4 more
  1. 2019Integration of Neural Network-Based Symbolic Regression in Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 93
  2. 2019Bayesian Symbolic Regressioncited by 77
  3. 2018Learning concise representations for regression by evolving networks of treescited by 33
  4. 2021Learning Mean-Field Equations from Particle Data Using WSINDycited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

6 papers.