mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Efficient Vision-Language Tuning: More Information Density, More Generalizability

arXiv 2312.10813 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2023cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

With the advancement of large pre-trained vision-language models, effectively transferring the knowledge embedded within these foundational models to downstream tasks has become a pivotal topic, particularly in data-scarce environments. Recently, parameter-efficient fine-tuning approaches, especially prompt tuning, have garnered considerable attention. To better understand the nature of prompt tuning, we propose the concept of ``Information Density'' (ID) to indicate whether a matrix strongly belongs to certain feature spaces rather than being evenly distributed across various feature spaces. We suppose a higher ID with strong bias across some feature spaces naturally leads to excellent robustness and stability. Our research, inspired by the observation that generalizability is closely linked to the information density of the prompt matrix, introduces the Dense Information Prompt (DIP). DIP aims to enhance information density to improve generalization. Furthermore, DIP significantly reduces the number of tunable parameters and the requisite storage space, making it particularly advantageous in resource-constrained settings. Comprehensive experiments substantiate the superiority of DIP. Notably, DIP surpasses the latest state-of-the-art methods by a substantial margin with an exceptionally small parameter count. Across a range of tasks spanning 11 datasets, DIP improves the average downstream accuracy of classic prompt tuning by up to 5.76% using merely 0.5K parameters.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 56 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.

Builds on

56 of 74 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Read-only Prompt Optimization for Vision-Language Few-shot Learning29 Aug
  2. 2023Regularized Mask Tuning: Uncovering Hidden Knowledge in Pre-trained Vision-Language Models27 Jul
  3. 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimization23 Mar
  4. 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning30 May
  5. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  6. 2021Decoupling Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentation15 Dec
  7. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  8. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  9. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  10. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  11. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  12. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
36 more
  1. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  2. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  3. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  4. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  5. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  6. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
  7. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  8. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  9. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  10. 2022Language-driven Semantic Segmentationcited by 711
  11. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  12. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  13. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  14. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  15. 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 530
  16. 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 509
  17. 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 439
  18. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  19. 2021Prompting Visual-Language Models for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 309
  20. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 292
  21. 2023Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 272
  22. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  23. 2022Open-Vocabulary DETR with Conditional Matchingcited by 220
  24. 2022Bridging the Gap between Object and Image-level Representations for Open-Vocabulary Detectioncited by 145
  25. 2022PromptDet: Towards Open-vocabulary Detection using Uncurated Imagescited by 133
  26. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 133
  27. 2020ResRep: Lossless CNN Pruning via Decoupling Remembering and Forgettingcited by 85
  28. 2021Class-agnostic Object Detection with Multi-modal Transformercited by 85
  29. 2023DiffRate : Differentiable Compression Rate for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 78
  30. 2019Centripetal SGD for Pruning Very Deep Convolutional Networks with Complicated Structurecited by 76
  31. 2022LASP: Text-to-Text Optimization for Language-Aware Soft Prompting of Vision & Language Modelscited by 58
  32. 2022Multimodal Open-Vocabulary Video Classification via Pre-Trained Vision and Language Modelscited by 22
  33. 2023Consolidator: Mergeable Adapter with Grouped Connections for Visual Adaptationcited by 18
  34. 2021Manipulating Identical Filter Redundancy for Efficient Pruning on Deep and Complicated CNNcited by 9
  35. 2023CAIT: Triple-Win Compression towards High Accuracy, Fast Inference, and Favorable Transferability For ViTscited by 9
  36. 2020MTP: Multi-Task Pruning for Efficient Semantic Segmentation Networkscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2023Distribution-Aware Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025GLAD: Generalizable Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2023ArGue: Attribute-Guided Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Enhancing Target-unspecific Tasks through a Features Matrix
  6. 2024Can Better Text Semantics in Prompt Tuning Improve VLM Generalization?
  7. 2025Generalizing Vision-Language Models with Dedicated Prompt Guidance
  8. 2023Gradient-Regulated Meta-Prompt Learning for Generalizable Vision-Language Models