Deep dive into language traits of AI-generated Abstracts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative language models, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their ability to generate human-like writing in various fields, including academic research. The rapid proliferation of generated texts has bolstered the need for automatic identification to uphold transparency and trust in the information. However, these generated texts closely resemble human writing and often have subtle differences in the grammatical structure, tones, and patterns, which makes systematic scrutinization challenging. In this work, we attempt to detect the Abstracts generated by ChatGPT, which are much shorter in length and bounded. We extract the texts semantic and lexical properties and observe that traditional machine learning models can confidently detect these Abstracts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.
Builds on
6 of 27 references.
References · 6
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2021Is GPT-3 Text Indistinguishable from Human Text? Scarecrow: A Framework for Scrutinizing Machine Textcited by 89
- 2023CHEAT: A Large-scale Dataset for Detecting ChatGPT-writtEn AbsTractscited by 40
- 2023Linear Classifier: An Often-Forgotten Baseline for Text Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.