SAME: Sample Reconstruction against Model Extraction Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While deep learning models have shown significant performance across various domains, their deployment needs extensive resources and advanced computing infrastructure. As a solution, Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) has emerged, lowering the barriers for users to release or productize their deep learning models. However, previous studies have highlighted potential privacy and security concerns associated with MLaaS, and one primary threat is model extraction attacks. To address this, there are many defense solutions but they suffer from unrealistic assumptions and generalization issues, making them less practical for reliable protection. Driven by these limitations, we introduce a novel defense mechanism, SAME, based on the concept of sample reconstruction. This strategy imposes minimal prerequisites on the defender's capabilities, eliminating the need for auxiliary Out-of-Distribution (OOD) datasets, user query history, white-box model access, and additional intervention during model training. It is compatible with existing active defense methods. Our extensive experiments corroborate the superior efficacy of SAME over state-of-the-art solutions. Our code is available at https://github.com/xythink/SAME.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.
Builds on
18 of 32 references.
References · 18
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
- 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 124
- 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
- 2018Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extractioncited by 85
- 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 57
6 more
- 2021Delving into Data: Effectively Substitute Training for Black-box Attackcited by 27
- 2020Stealing Deep Reinforcement Learning Models for Fun and Profitcited by 24
- 2022Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Workcited by 21
- 2023Extracting Cloud-based Model with Prior Knowledgecited by 5
- 2023FilterFL: Knowledge Filtering-based Data-Free Backdoor Defense for Federated Learningcited by 5
- 2023FDINet: Protecting against DNN Model Extraction via Feature Distortion Indexcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Surveycited by 39
- 2024Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMscited by 5
- 2026AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026SoK: Colluding Adversaries in Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026SoK: Colluding Adversaries in Machine Learning Pipelines8 Jun 2026
- 2026AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective25 Mar 2026
- 2024Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMs30 Jul 2024
- 2024Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Survey20 Mar 2024