Early ChatGPT User Portrait through the Lens of Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Since its launch, ChatGPT has achieved remarkable success as a versatile conversational AI platform, drawing millions of users worldwide and garnering widespread recognition across academic, industrial, and general communities. This paper aims to point a portrait of early GPT users and understand how they evolved. Specific questions include their topics of interest and their potential careers; and how this changes over time. We conduct a detailed analysis of real-world ChatGPT datasets with multi-turn conversations between users and ChatGPT. Through a multi-pronged approach, we quantify conversation dynamics by examining the number of turns, then gauge sentiment to understand user sentiment variations, and finally employ Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to discern overarching topics within the conversation. By understanding shifts in user demographics and interests, we aim to shed light on the changing nature of human-AI interaction and anticipate future trends in user engagement with language models.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2023.
Builds on
8 of 20 references.
References · 8
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
- 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 172
- 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 167
- 2023Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hintscited by 42
- 2023Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detectioncited by 41
- 2023ChatGPT and Software Testing Education: Promises & Perilscited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AIcited by 13
- 2024Generative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspectivecited by 7
- 2025MMD-Flagger: Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy to Detect Hallucinationscited by 0
- 2026Is Length Really A Liability? An Evaluation of Multi-turn LLM Conversations using BoolQcited by 0
- 2026CUPID in the Model Zoo: Online Matchmaking for Selecting Your Dream LLMcited by 0
- 2026The Privacy Fallacy of Crowdsourced Fine-Tuning: Extracting Proprietary Data via Topic-Based Poisoningcited by 0
- 2026The Privacy Fallacy of Crowdsourced Fine-Tuning: Extracting Proprietary Data via Topic-Based Poisoning27 Sep 2026
- 2026CUPID in the Model Zoo: Online Matchmaking for Selecting Your Dream LLM30 May 2026
- 2026Is Length Really A Liability? An Evaluation of Multi-turn LLM Conversations using BoolQ23 Jan 2026
- 2025Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AI11 Nov 2025
- 2025MMD-Flagger: Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy to Detect Hallucinations2 Jun 2025
- 2024Generative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspective20 Oct 2024