A Kronecker product accelerated efficient sparse Gaussian Process (E-SGP) for flow emulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we introduce an efficient sparse Gaussian process (E-SGP) for the surrogate modelling of fluid mechanics. This novel Bayesian machine learning algorithm allows efficient model training using databases of different structures. It is a further development of the approximated sparse GP algorithm, combining the concept of efficient GP (E-GP) and variational energy free sparse Gaussian process (VEF-SGP). The developed E-SGP approach exploits the arbitrariness of inducing points and the monotonically increasing nature of the objective function with respect to the number of inducing points in VEF-SGP. By specifying the inducing points on the orthogonal grid/input subspace and using the Kronecker product, E-SGP significantly improves computational efficiency without imposing any constraints on the covariance matrix or increasing the number of parameters that need to be optimised during training. The E-SGP algorithm developed in this paper outperforms E-GP not only in scalability but also in model quality in terms of mean standardized logarithmic loss (MSLL). The computational complexity of E-GP suffers from the cubic growth regarding the growing structured training database. However, E-SGP maintains computational efficiency whilst the resolution of the model, (i.e., the number of inducing points) remains fixed. The examples show that E-SGP produces more accurate predictions in comparison with E-GP when the model resolutions are similar in both. E-GP benefits from more training data but comes with higher computational demands, while E-SGP achieves a comparable level of accuracy but is more computationally efficient, making E-SGP a potentially preferable choice for fluid mechanic problems. Furthermore, E-SGP can produce more reasonable estimates of model uncertainty, whilst E-GP is more likely to produce over-confident predictions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.
Builds on
19 of 38 references.
References · 19
- 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
- 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 383
- 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 228
- 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 206
- 2015Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Structured Gaussian Processes (KISS-GP)cited by 177
- 2019Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principlescited by 158
- 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 140
- 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
- 2017Numerical Gaussian Processes for Time-dependent and Non-linear Partial Differential Equationscited by 72
- 2017Adversarial Examples, Uncertainty, and Transfer Testing Robustness in Gaussian Process Hybrid Deep Networkscited by 48
- 2018Product Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Gaussian Processescited by 31
- 2021Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Online Gaussian Processescited by 18
7 more
- 2017Efficient Modeling of Latent Information in Supervised Learning using Gaussian Processescited by 14
- 2020Physics-Aware Gaussian Processes in Remote Sensingcited by 14
- 2021Applying Machine Learning to Study Fluid Mechanicscited by 13
- 2018Structured Bayesian Gaussian process latent variable model: applications to data-driven dimensionality reduction and high-dimensional inversioncited by 9
- 2017Gaussian Process Latent Force Models for Learning and Stochastic Control of Physical Systemscited by 8
- 2021Data-Centric Engineering: integrating simulation, machine learning and statistics. Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 7
- 2013Efficient State-Space Inference of Periodic Latent Force Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.