RDR: the Recap, Deliberate, and Respond Method for Enhanced Language Understanding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Natural language understanding (NLU) using neural network pipelines often requires additional context that is not solely present in the input data. Through Prior research, it has been evident that NLU benchmarks are susceptible to manipulation by neural models, wherein these models exploit statistical artifacts within the encoded external knowledge to artificially inflate performance metrics for downstream tasks. Our proposed approach, known as the Recap, Deliberate, and Respond (RDR) paradigm, addresses this issue by incorporating three distinct objectives within the neural network pipeline. Firstly, the Recap objective involves paraphrasing the input text using a paraphrasing model in order to summarize and encapsulate its essence. Secondly, the Deliberation objective entails encoding external graph information related to entities mentioned in the input text, utilizing a graph embedding model. Finally, the Respond objective employs a classification head model that utilizes representations from the Recap and Deliberation modules to generate the final prediction. By cascading these three models and minimizing a combined loss, we mitigate the potential for gaming the benchmark and establish a robust method for capturing the underlying semantic patterns, thus enabling accurate predictions. To evaluate the effectiveness of the RDR method, we conduct tests on multiple GLUE benchmark tasks. Our results demonstrate improved performance compared to competitive baselines, with an enhancement of up to 2% on standard metrics. Furthermore, we analyze the observed evidence for semantic understanding exhibited by RDR models, emphasizing their ability to avoid gaming the benchmark and instead accurately capture the true underlying semantic patterns.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.
Builds on
16 of 29 references.
References · 16
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2018Transforming Question Answering Datasets Into Natural Language Inference Datasetscited by 99
- 2019Natural Language Understanding with the Quora Question Pairs Datasetcited by 51
- 2021Knowledge-intensive Language Understanding for Explainable AIcited by 25
- 2022Process Knowledge-Infused AI: Towards User-level Explainability, Interpretability, and Safetycited by 18
- 2023ProKnow: Process Knowledge for Safety Constrained and Explainable Question Generation for Mental Health Diagnostic Assistancecited by 10
- 2023Process Knowledge-infused Learning for Clinician-friendly Explanationscited by 8
4 more
- 2021Knowledge Infused Policy Gradients with Upper Confidence Bound for Relational Banditscited by 6
- 2023Knowledge Graph Guided Semantic Evaluation of Language Models For User Trustcited by 3
- 2023Cook-Gen: Robust Generative Modeling of Cooking Actions from Recipescited by 3
- 2023IERL: Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning -- Combining CrowdSourced Knowledge and Distributed Semantic Representationscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.