Drivers and Barriers of AI Adoption and Use in Scientific Research
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
New technologies have the power to revolutionize science. It has happened in the past and is happening again with the emergence of new computational tools, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Despite the documented impact of these technologies, there remains a significant gap in understanding the process of their adoption within the scientific community. In this paper, we draw on theories of scientific and technical human capital to study the integration of AI in scientific research, focusing on the human capital of scientists and the external resources available within their network of collaborators and institutions. We validate our hypotheses on a large sample of publications from OpenAlex, covering all sciences from 1980 to 2020, and identify a set key drivers and inhibitors of AI adoption and use in science. Our results suggest that AI is pioneered by domain scientists with a `taste for exploration' and who are embedded in a network rich of computer scientists, experienced AI scientists and early-career researchers; they come from institutions with high citation impact and a relatively strong publication history on AI. The access to computing resources only matters for a few scientific disciplines, such as chemistry and medical sciences. Once AI is integrated into research, most adoption factors continue to influence its subsequent reuse. Implications for the organization and management of science in the evolving era of AI-driven discovery are discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problemcited by 3
- 2026AI in Science: Early Insightscited by 0
- 2026AI in Science: Early Insights15 Sep 2026
- 2025AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problem8 Sep 2025